7.2 sec in total
255 ms
6.7 sec
239 ms
Click here to check amazing Sceye content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sceye.biz
sceye (scanning eye) ist die moderne Art Dokumente zu scannen.
Visit sceye.bizWe analyzed Sceye.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sceye.biz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value20.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
255 ms
1003 ms
294 ms
316 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sceye.biz, 68% (73 requests) were made to Sceye.eu and 15% (16 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Sceye.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 312.7 kB (34%)
907.7 kB
595.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sceye.biz main page is 907.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 623.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sceye needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 175.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sceye.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 175.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (49%)
105
54
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sceye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sceye.biz
255 ms
1003 ms
k2.css
294 ms
widgetkit-89fa5a37.css
316 ms
gplight.css
198 ms
style1.css
202 ms
template.css
203 ms
template.css
204 ms
mootools-core.js
496 ms
core.js
397 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
k2.js
399 ms
caption.js
404 ms
jquery.js
696 ms
widgetkit-8bea7dbc.js
523 ms
mootools-more.js
907 ms
base.css
603 ms
extensions.css
1174 ms
tools.css
821 ms
layout.css
718 ms
menus.css
2071 ms
modules.css
949 ms
system.css
950 ms
verdana.css
2073 ms
verdana.css
1121 ms
verdana.css
1109 ms
verdana.css
2196 ms
responsive.css
1318 ms
custom.css
1315 ms
print.css
2198 ms
warp.js
1524 ms
responsive.js
1516 ms
accordionmenu.js
2286 ms
dropdownmenu.js
1730 ms
template.js
2399 ms
error.css
2266 ms
style.css
2263 ms
all.js
2721 ms
popup.js
2393 ms
lightbox.js
1772 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
2470 ms
spotlight.js
1793 ms
base.css
1653 ms
tools.css
2128 ms
layout.css
1754 ms
modules.css
1747 ms
system.css
2126 ms
system.css
1981 ms
system-all.css
1959 ms
responsive.css
1753 ms
menus.css
1062 ms
print.css
925 ms
layout.css
568 ms
detect.js
321 ms
7.jpg
791 ms
ribfacebook.png
203 ms
en.gif
211 ms
de.gif
214 ms
es.gif
206 ms
fr.gif
790 ms
it.gif
402 ms
ru.gif
788 ms
us.gif
420 ms
Home-German.png
708 ms
sceyeMotion-1.jpg
962 ms
sceyeMotion-4.jpg
729 ms
4.png
971 ms
ga.js
44 ms
,
37 ms
slideshow.js
917 ms
back-to-top.png
958 ms
likebox.php
180 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
controls.png
884 ms
likebox.php
131 ms
E3TzvQNU166.css
287 ms
Q-OWgaJvbhn.css
355 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
492 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
623 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
522 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
522 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
679 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
523 ms
10703683_726419724104483_7678394084697443768_n.jpg
288 ms
1912364_715492861863836_8558362313549074822_n.png
355 ms
10258541_636093199803848_2655037714449948627_n.jpg
424 ms
12063340_104642939898030_1665532105284922300_n.jpg
488 ms
12342460_1107227769296102_8654585423034769008_n.jpg
488 ms
11825799_830815137034826_4497388007586680314_n.jpg
561 ms
1012595_432531630288232_8826577758302022804_n.jpg
552 ms
11259533_10204560594163785_9059396166424580981_n.jpg
491 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
83 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
82 ms
10703683_726419724104483_7678394084697443768_n.jpg
510 ms
12802764_1764886257074493_1276494720359685194_n.jpg
507 ms
12745472_122018274851815_1364464514565096155_n.jpg
508 ms
12246901_197140400621322_7916218882620145882_n.jpg
510 ms
11401312_116738871992033_1495974671327931066_n.jpg
612 ms
479718_1576969732625334_1202011099922232027_n.jpg
577 ms
12647144_220991574908881_436200942349197889_n.jpg
575 ms
12800237_102805893447277_6095545299405239262_n.jpg
577 ms
Home-English-Logistic.png
401 ms
Home-English-Folder.png
398 ms
Home-English-StapledPages.png
502 ms
Home-English-Book.png
524 ms
Home-English-Envelope.png
421 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
73 ms
sceye.biz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sceye.biz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sceye.biz SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sceye.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Sceye.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sceye.biz
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sceye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: