3.7 sec in total
210 ms
2.7 sec
742 ms
Welcome to schaduf.com homepage info - get ready to check Schaduf best content right away, or after learning these important things about schaduf.com
Choose green, Choose sustainability, Choose The house of expertise of Green Wall in the Middle East, Choose Schaduf.
Visit schaduf.comWe analyzed Schaduf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
schaduf.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value2,350 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value28.3 s
0/100
10%
210 ms
361 ms
338 ms
657 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Schaduf.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (669 ms) belongs to the original domain Schaduf.com.
Page size can be reduced by 200.7 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
891.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Schaduf.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 536.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Schaduf needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 18.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schaduf.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (89%)
89
10
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schaduf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 75 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
schaduf.com
210 ms
schaduf.com
361 ms
thegem-pagespeed-lazy-items.js
338 ms
58e910d25afedb86ae67b0fa99189988.css
657 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
548 ms
confirm.min.js
357 ms
widget-members.min.js
38 ms
jquery-query.min.js
49 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
63 ms
jquery-scroll-to.min.js
61 ms
buddypress.min.js
72 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
73 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
558 ms
zilla-likes.js
81 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
91 ms
v4-shims.min.js
101 ms
js
67 ms
droidarabickufi.cssDosis:400%7CRoboto:400&display=swap
22 ms
thegem-form-elements.js
91 ms
jquery.easing.js
104 ms
SmoothScroll.js
113 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
122 ms
thegem-menu_init.js
131 ms
thegem-header.js
142 ms
functions.js
151 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
166 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
174 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
185 ms
comment-reply.min.js
195 ms
index.js
204 ms
index.js
215 ms
bootstrap.js
225 ms
counter_nscript.js
239 ms
waypoints.min.js
249 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
257 ms
rbtools.min.js
271 ms
rs6.min.js
283 ms
js.cookie.min.js
312 ms
woocommerce.min.js
619 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
308 ms
front-scripts.min.js
308 ms
cart_widget.min.js
316 ms
general.min.js
580 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
316 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
317 ms
vc-accordion.js
325 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
325 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
326 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
326 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
328 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
332 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
332 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
340 ms
hooks.min.js
339 ms
i18n.min.js
338 ms
frontend.min.js
338 ms
waypoints.min.js
334 ms
core.min.js
334 ms
frontend.min.js
334 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
333 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.min.js
410 ms
frontend.min.js
321 ms
underscore.min.js
320 ms
wp-util.min.js
669 ms
frontend.min.js
307 ms
lazyload.min.js
307 ms
gtm.js
80 ms
fbevents.js
75 ms
logo_76fd5d4d8ec4c132a9c88b54c923f563_1x.png
642 ms
logo_00ff68b7342a4159c31816269e9ffe53_1x.png
641 ms
dummy.png
641 ms
js
92 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
us.png
574 ms
thegem-icons.woff
572 ms
eg.png
615 ms
hotjar-1265201.js
482 ms
4495344.js
152 ms
collect
67 ms
collect
74 ms
collect
94 ms
leaf-icon-2.png
634 ms
collect
47 ms
js
37 ms
ga-audiences
347 ms
eicons.woff
578 ms
ga-audiences
434 ms
banner.js
509 ms
4495344.js
604 ms
fb.js
605 ms
collectedforms.js
507 ms
modules.2472296d2d26f0040059.js
235 ms
montserrat-ultralight.woff
515 ms
vc_linecons.woff
412 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
576 ms
thegem-socials.woff
412 ms
schaduf.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
schaduf.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
schaduf.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schaduf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schaduf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
schaduf.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Schaduf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: