944 ms in total
271 ms
483 ms
190 ms
Visit scorekeeper.com now to see the best up-to-date Scorekeeper content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scorekeeper.com
Life Insurance
Visit scorekeeper.comWe analyzed Scorekeeper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 673 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
scorekeeper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
271 ms
180 ms
116 ms
136 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Scorekeeper.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Worldtimeserver.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) belongs to the original domain Scorekeeper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 316.8 kB (59%)
538.3 kB
221.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Scorekeeper.com main page is 538.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scorekeeper needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 245.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 245.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
28
28
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scorekeeper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
scorekeeper.com
271 ms
SK%20Logo%20from%20WordArt.jpg
180 ms
since1989-2.gif
116 ms
Visa-MC-AmEx-Discover-Paypal.png
136 ms
lg-share-en.gif
73 ms
addthis_widget.js
9 ms
Button-homepage.GIF
105 ms
Button-OrderSecure.GIF
103 ms
Button-Demo.gif
110 ms
Button-mail.GIF
136 ms
barsback2006_01.JPG
107 ms
embed.js
69 ms
GeoTrust_DW.gif
103 ms
Paypal_Cards_LeftMargin.jpg
103 ms
fedex_pretty.gif
103 ms
USGAcourselookup.gif
165 ms
welcome03.gif
165 ms
coursepond01.jpg
169 ms
PDF_Acrobat_transparent.gif
166 ms
ScoreKeeperIcon2012WhiteBkrnd.png
165 ms
SKMainWindow90_small1.jpg
168 ms
red%20square%20dot.GIF
174 ms
HandiCardFilledIn_small2.gif
164 ms
Trend07_small.JPG
164 ms
4someBuilder07_small.jpg
168 ms
best_ball_2002_small.gif
169 ms
red%20square%20dot.gif
194 ms
Button-OrderSecure.gif
195 ms
Button-homepage.gif
192 ms
Button-mail.gif
162 ms
300lo.json
75 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
32 ms
scorekeeper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scorekeeper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
scorekeeper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scorekeeper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Scorekeeper.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
scorekeeper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scorekeeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: