3.7 sec in total
9 ms
1 sec
2.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Scorestrike content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about scorestrike.com
Follow online scores for 3000+ leagues also on mobile. Get results, fixtures, h2h, tables, schedules & advanced stats. Watch soccer event videos.
Visit scorestrike.comWe analyzed Scorestrike.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
scorestrike.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value1.304
1/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
9 ms
36 ms
48 ms
44 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 206 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Scorestrike.com, 83% (172 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (715 ms) relates to the external source Applesocial.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 488.5 kB (42%)
1.2 MB
677.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Scorestrike.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 449.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 335.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 335.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scorestrike needs image optimization as it can save up to 148.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scorestrike.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 149 (74%)
201
52
The browser has sent 201 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scorestrike. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scorestrike.com
9 ms
www.scorestrike.com
36 ms
css
48 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
index.css
18 ms
sub.css
20 ms
main.css
20 ms
adsbygoogle.js
189 ms
adsbygoogle.js
288 ms
index.js
25 ms
js
181 ms
logo.png
136 ms
s1.png
98 ms
s2.png
196 ms
s3.png
178 ms
s10.png
177 ms
s11.png
197 ms
s12.svg
196 ms
sanfranciscodisplay-regular-webfont.woff
715 ms
2004.png
372 ms
api.scorestrike.com
332 ms
Champions_League.png
143 ms
laliga.png
141 ms
premier.png
143 ms
ligue1.png
152 ms
2003.png
284 ms
2005.png
284 ms
2002.png
283 ms
2007.png
283 ms
2006.png
488 ms
2001.png
399 ms
2.png
400 ms
3.png
401 ms
5.png
327 ms
6.png
400 ms
8.png
487 ms
9.png
487 ms
10.png
488 ms
11.png
488 ms
12.png
486 ms
13.png
498 ms
14.png
492 ms
16.png
497 ms
17.png
490 ms
19.png
497 ms
20.png
494 ms
22.png
501 ms
23.png
499 ms
24.png
503 ms
25.png
508 ms
26.png
505 ms
27.png
507 ms
28.png
509 ms
30.png
533 ms
31.png
511 ms
32.png
514 ms
36.png
523 ms
33.png
521 ms
34.png
519 ms
35.png
520 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
321 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
164 ms
show_ads_impl.js
222 ms
zrt_lookup.html
251 ms
js
139 ms
analytics.js
226 ms
40.png
245 ms
41.png
250 ms
42.png
254 ms
43.png
255 ms
211.png
215 ms
47.png
214 ms
48.png
145 ms
49.png
147 ms
50.png
150 ms
ads
307 ms
collect
38 ms
51.png
82 ms
ads
262 ms
ads
288 ms
52.png
63 ms
53.png
66 ms
54.png
65 ms
56.png
69 ms
45.png
70 ms
57.png
71 ms
58.png
68 ms
59.png
70 ms
60.png
69 ms
63.png
69 ms
176.png
72 ms
64.png
72 ms
66.png
99 ms
67.png
69 ms
68.png
82 ms
69.png
70 ms
71.png
72 ms
72.png
75 ms
73.png
71 ms
74.png
78 ms
75.png
98 ms
225.png
73 ms
76.png
76 ms
80.png
72 ms
81.png
77 ms
83.png
77 ms
84.png
77 ms
85.png
74 ms
86.png
76 ms
87.png
76 ms
88.png
81 ms
89.png
80 ms
90.png
74 ms
91.png
76 ms
92.png
127 ms
93.png
127 ms
94.png
126 ms
95.png
130 ms
96.png
124 ms
97.png
123 ms
98.png
120 ms
99.png
118 ms
101.png
118 ms
224.png
117 ms
102.png
115 ms
103.png
115 ms
104.png
112 ms
105.png
113 ms
106.png
111 ms
107.png
105 ms
108.png
105 ms
109.png
102 ms
110.png
101 ms
111.png
99 ms
112.png
96 ms
113.png
94 ms
115.png
92 ms
116.png
91 ms
117.png
90 ms
118.png
88 ms
119.png
87 ms
121.png
85 ms
122.png
85 ms
123.png
82 ms
124.png
82 ms
125.png
81 ms
216.png
79 ms
127.png
80 ms
128.png
78 ms
129.png
27 ms
130.png
29 ms
132.png
29 ms
135.png
30 ms
136.png
32 ms
137.png
29 ms
65.png
30 ms
138.png
31 ms
139.png
34 ms
140.png
33 ms
141.png
34 ms
142.png
31 ms
143.png
33 ms
145.png
35 ms
146.png
39 ms
222.png
36 ms
147.png
35 ms
148.png
37 ms
150.png
41 ms
151.png
38 ms
152.png
51 ms
153.png
43 ms
156.png
51 ms
158.png
51 ms
159.png
49 ms
160.png
48 ms
204.png
54 ms
161.png
48 ms
162.png
64 ms
163.png
62 ms
164.png
61 ms
165.png
61 ms
168.png
71 ms
169.png
60 ms
174.png
61 ms
177.png
59 ms
178.png
58 ms
179.png
56 ms
181.png
58 ms
182.png
59 ms
183.png
65 ms
184.png
63 ms
186.png
64 ms
187.png
74 ms
188.png
95 ms
189.png
78 ms
191.png
65 ms
192.png
67 ms
193.png
68 ms
194.png
70 ms
195.png
75 ms
197.png
76 ms
199.png
76 ms
200.png
78 ms
202.png
79 ms
206.png
77 ms
207.png
77 ms
scorestrike.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
scorestrike.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
scorestrike.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scorestrike.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scorestrike.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
scorestrike.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scorestrike. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: