3.2 sec in total
434 ms
2.7 sec
79 ms
Click here to check amazing Sea Doo content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sea-doo.net
Visit sea-doo.netWe analyzed Sea-doo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sea-doo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
20/100
10%
434 ms
67 ms
70 ms
131 ms
1349 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sea-doo.net, 45% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 27% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 283.1 kB (38%)
741.2 kB
458.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Sea-doo.net main page is 741.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 364.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 275.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sea Doo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (48%)
25
13
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sea Doo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sea-doo.net
434 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
67 ms
minified.js
70 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
131 ms
polyfill.min.js
1349 ms
thunderbolt-commons.4cd1896d.bundle.min.js
126 ms
main.0036c9a3.bundle.min.js
128 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
127 ms
lodash.min.js
124 ms
react.production.min.js
128 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
131 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
129 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
129 ms
cc89ae_f988a45da81843ba96d8f1d3c975991e~mv2_d_1920_1200_s_2.jpg
333 ms
cc89ae_b27a33273b1a4f08b1bb24d74fd402ce~mv2.png
517 ms
cc89ae_3fe534383e73461eb7f2dea67661ab6f~mv2.png
540 ms
cc89ae_f007105339df4f29b934301e8f329338~mv2.gif
339 ms
cc89ae_d3b335810ebd4f3aa8d888c87ddba1c4~mv2.jpeg
533 ms
cc89ae_3fe534383e73461eb7f2dea67661ab6f~mv2.png
570 ms
2023%20MODEL.jpeg
591 ms
2021%20Sea-Doo%20RXPX_Action_a.jpg
677 ms
bundle.min.js
53 ms
Fraunces_120pt-Bold.ttf
45 ms
Fraunces_120pt-SemiBold.ttf
46 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
46 ms
AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff
46 ms
c81cca03-5f1a-4252-9950-096e60e2bde9.woff
46 ms
127 ms
116 ms
117 ms
117 ms
119 ms
118 ms
151 ms
144 ms
145 ms
149 ms
149 ms
143 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
28 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
sea-doo.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sea-doo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sea-doo.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sea-doo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sea-doo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sea-doo.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sea Doo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: