2.5 sec in total
240 ms
1.6 sec
737 ms
Welcome to securedvoting.com homepage info - get ready to check Secured Voting best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about securedvoting.com
online voting system secure software best for association, club, society, union, hoa elections and AGM Resolution Motion poll with manual ballot.
Visit securedvoting.comWe analyzed Securedvoting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
securedvoting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
240 ms
407 ms
32 ms
27 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Securedvoting.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (756 ms) belongs to the original domain Securedvoting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 236.7 kB (41%)
570.8 kB
334.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Securedvoting.com main page is 570.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 275.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secured Voting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securedvoting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (18%)
67
55
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secured Voting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securedvoting.com
240 ms
securedvoting.com
407 ms
icon
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
animate.css
192 ms
style.css
259 ms
online-voting-system.webp
335 ms
locked.webp
336 ms
chains.webp
336 ms
mobile-security.webp
277 ms
anonymous-voting.webp
277 ms
quick.webp
278 ms
save-money.webp
284 ms
weighted-voting.webp
285 ms
transparent-voting.webp
294 ms
random-voting.webp
293 ms
voting-demo.webp
307 ms
election-demo.webp
339 ms
club.webp
347 ms
ngo.webp
348 ms
homeowner.webp
358 ms
union.webp
361 ms
chamber.webp
362 ms
institution.webp
403 ms
emp.webp
411 ms
corporate.webp
417 ms
onlinevote.webp
422 ms
onlinevote2.webp
424 ms
onlinevote3.webp
424 ms
fronjunior_175x175.webp
465 ms
axemenmc_175x175.webp
478 ms
Jtfunion_175x175.webp
478 ms
hongyuan_175X175.webp
495 ms
iyf_175x175.webp
490 ms
simpler_175X175.webp
489 ms
esic_175X175.webp
529 ms
spo_175X175.webp
541 ms
UAE_175X175.webp
543 ms
howitwork.webp
502 ms
element.js
57 ms
js
59 ms
profile.js
50 ms
jquery.min.js
756 ms
smooth-scroll.js
501 ms
css
14 ms
wow.min.js
407 ms
common.js
337 ms
RapidSSL_SEAL-90x50.gif
341 ms
close.png
351 ms
intro-bg.jpg
400 ms
secured-voting-logo.webp
400 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
11 ms
about-bg.jpg
406 ms
table-bg.jpg
474 ms
tick.png
406 ms
option.webp
448 ms
members.webp
435 ms
position.webp
439 ms
candidate.webp
419 ms
payment.webp
461 ms
active.webp
460 ms
contact-bg.jpg
597 ms
fb_icon_w.png
466 ms
tw_icon_w.png
480 ms
gp_icon_w.png
471 ms
pin_icon_w.png
463 ms
tum_icon_w.png
462 ms
js
45 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
49 ms
securedvoting.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
securedvoting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
securedvoting.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securedvoting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securedvoting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securedvoting.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Secured Voting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: