3.1 sec in total
191 ms
2.4 sec
500 ms
Click here to check amazing Secure Screening Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about securescreeningservices.com
We provide reliable and efficient background screening checks for businesses and organisations. Trust us for all your background screening needs.
Visit securescreeningservices.comWe analyzed Securescreeningservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
securescreeningservices.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value1,650 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
191 ms
320 ms
398 ms
83 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Securescreeningservices.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Beacon-v2.helpscout.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) belongs to the original domain Securescreeningservices.com.
Page size can be reduced by 120.6 kB (4%)
3.1 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Securescreeningservices.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure Screening Services images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securescreeningservices.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (64%)
56
20
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Screening Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securescreeningservices.com
191 ms
securescreeningservices.com
320 ms
www.securescreeningservices.com
398 ms
rudder-analytics.min.js
83 ms
gtm.js
112 ms
style03.css
76 ms
style.min.css
158 ms
classic-themes.min.css
231 ms
front.min.css
332 ms
jquery.min.3.6.1.js
361 ms
jquery-migrate.min.3.3.2.js
331 ms
front.min.js
332 ms
5216364.js
206 ms
jquery.min.js
36 ms
all.js
443 ms
593ff87699.js
62 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.3.12.6.js
330 ms
purecounter.js
443 ms
css2
82 ms
js
80 ms
bat.js
52 ms
destination
112 ms
insight.min.js
59 ms
26054214.js
16 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
185 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
215 ms
26054214
50 ms
clarity.js
92 ms
logo-wt.svg
99 ms
usericon.png
96 ms
grad.svg
96 ms
arrowdown.png
95 ms
watermark.svg
95 ms
ncc-logo.png
223 ms
ncrcg.png
234 ms
bnf-logo.png
233 ms
concept-logo.png
340 ms
dotsblack.png
233 ms
iso-1.svg
225 ms
nqa-colour.svg
267 ms
ce.png
320 ms
ceplus.png
321 ms
logo-pbsa-logo.svg
321 ms
facebook.svg
324 ms
linkedin.svg
343 ms
instagram.svg
395 ms
x.svg
399 ms
youtube.svg
401 ms
fbevents.js
100 ms
font
167 ms
5216364.js
211 ms
banner.js
255 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
231 ms
reduce-employee-churn-sss.jpg
307 ms
ISON_220518_SSS_0414.jpg
529 ms
beacon-v2.helpscout.net
27 ms
vendor.0c11f266.js
4 ms
main.e246cd3b.js
7 ms
c.gif
8 ms
securescreeningservices.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
securescreeningservices.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
securescreeningservices.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securescreeningservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securescreeningservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securescreeningservices.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Secure Screening Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: