Tools & Wizards About Us
securityfenceminneapolis.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

securityfenceminneapolis.com

Fence Installation Minneapolis & St. Paul | (612)...

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

525 ms

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

securityfenceminneapolis.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Security Fence Minneapolis content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about securityfenceminneapolis.com

Minneapolis fence installation & fence company voted best in the Twin Cities. Contact us for the highest rated fence company in Minneapolis.

Visit securityfenceminneapolis.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Securityfenceminneapolis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securityfenceminneapolis.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value2

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.securityfenceminneapolis.com

174 ms

AATXAJy2s1VTvR3TSaKcc0dcrBInCl0T8wXWGhG1ej1x=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

60 ms

lazyload.min.js

19 ms

sf_logo.png

34 ms

sf-telephone-icon.png

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Securityfenceminneapolis.com, 20% (5 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (174 ms) belongs to the original domain Securityfenceminneapolis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.6 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Securityfenceminneapolis.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 115.4 kB

  • Original 153.1 kB
  • After minification 144.3 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Security Fence Minneapolis images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Security Fence Minneapolis. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.securityfenceminneapolis.com

www.securityfenceminneapolis.com

174 ms

AATXAJy2s1VTvR3TSaKcc0dcrBInCl0T8wXWGhG1ej1x=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

AATXAJy2s1VTvR3TSaKcc0dcrBInCl0T8wXWGhG1ej1x=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

60 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

19 ms

sf_logo.png

sf_logo.png

34 ms

sf-telephone-icon.png

sf-telephone-icon.png

53 ms

sf-banner.png

sf-banner.png

67 ms

sf-banner-left-arrow.png

sf-banner-left-arrow.png

53 ms

sf-banner-right-arrow.png

sf-banner-right-arrow.png

37 ms

IMG_0659.jpg

IMG_0659.jpg

40 ms

IMG_1907.jpg

IMG_1907.jpg

42 ms

IMG_1904.jpg

IMG_1904.jpg

52 ms

IMG_0602.jpg

IMG_0602.jpg

45 ms

IMG_0324.jpg

IMG_0324.jpg

77 ms

IMG_2243-2.jpg

IMG_2243-2.jpg

49 ms

sf-testimonials-background.png

sf-testimonials-background.png

55 ms

sf-blue-book.png

sf-blue-book.png

44 ms

sf-bbb.png

sf-bbb.png

68 ms

sf-afa.png

sf-afa.png

52 ms

sf-angies.png

sf-angies.png

45 ms

sf-contact-information-background.png

sf-contact-information-background.png

71 ms

sf-watermark.png

sf-watermark.png

54 ms

AATXAJwTWPfStQVs0GLTMJq1oNL_LNVzC3Nxjss0jH_2=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

AATXAJwTWPfStQVs0GLTMJq1oNL_LNVzC3Nxjss0jH_2=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

45 ms

AATXAJxgBO0CNyd7TsncVc5Qk3MVP-PFVbIinXUiFgIZ=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

AATXAJxgBO0CNyd7TsncVc5Qk3MVP-PFVbIinXUiFgIZ=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

51 ms

AATXAJxwYufyQ26hxTmrD9PoQgUj0J2ViCqlsolbSz13=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

AATXAJxwYufyQ26hxTmrD9PoQgUj0J2ViCqlsolbSz13=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100

43 ms

AOh14Gjl3OCr1wFrIbr55NU9ybCCBmj6v_6wNeh__hFaGA=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-ba4-br100

AOh14Gjl3OCr1wFrIbr55NU9ybCCBmj6v_6wNeh__hFaGA=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-ba4-br100

51 ms

Accessibility Review

securityfenceminneapolis.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

securityfenceminneapolis.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

securityfenceminneapolis.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securityfenceminneapolis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securityfenceminneapolis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securityfenceminneapolis.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Security Fence Minneapolis. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: