10.8 sec in total
387 ms
9.8 sec
555 ms
Visit selematic.it now to see the best up-to-date Selematic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about selematic.it
Dal 1978 Selematic SpA progetta e realizza macchine automatiche per l’imballaggio secondorio, interpretando i bisogni dei clienti più esigenti.
Visit selematic.itWe analyzed Selematic.it page load time and found that the first response time was 387 ms and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
selematic.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value21.1 s
0/100
10%
Value13,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.3 s
1/100
10%
387 ms
4911 ms
31 ms
329 ms
325 ms
Our browser made a total of 148 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Selematic.it, 91% (135 requests) were made to Selematic.tech and 6% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source Selematic.tech.
Page size can be reduced by 163.4 kB (9%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Selematic.it main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Selematic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selematic.it has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 96 (73%)
132
36
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selematic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
selematic.it
387 ms
www.selematic.tech
4911 ms
css
31 ms
dashicons.min.css
329 ms
font-awesome.min.css
325 ms
extra.min.css
322 ms
styles.css
321 ms
style.min.css
441 ms
font-awesome.min.css
355 ms
fonts.css
429 ms
settings.css
434 ms
style.min.css
432 ms
style.css
438 ms
font-awesome.min.css
477 ms
style.min.css
539 ms
style.css
543 ms
dripicons.css
542 ms
stylesheet.min.css
658 ms
print.css
554 ms
style_dynamic.css
594 ms
responsive.min.css
753 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
648 ms
js_composer.min.css
765 ms
custom_css.css
696 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
713 ms
jquery.min.js
866 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
804 ms
service-facebook-pixel.js
804 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
950 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
862 ms
cookie-list.js
882 ms
shortcode-block-cookie.js
883 ms
animate.min.css
888 ms
cookie-popup.js
1144 ms
jquery.base64.min.js
1145 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
997 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1148 ms
index.js
1144 ms
qode-like.min.js
1045 ms
core.min.js
1077 ms
accordion.min.js
1075 ms
menu.min.js
1071 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1070 ms
hooks.min.js
1043 ms
i18n.min.js
968 ms
a11y.min.js
1034 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1052 ms
controlgroup.min.js
1028 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
1013 ms
button.min.js
987 ms
datepicker.min.js
949 ms
mouse.min.js
1026 ms
resizable.min.js
1027 ms
draggable.min.js
1047 ms
dialog.min.js
1006 ms
droppable.min.js
953 ms
progressbar.min.js
908 ms
selectable.min.js
991 ms
sortable.min.js
973 ms
slider.min.js
931 ms
spinner.min.js
886 ms
tooltip.min.js
885 ms
tabs.min.js
914 ms
effect.min.js
932 ms
effect-blind.min.js
914 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
915 ms
effect-clip.min.js
916 ms
effect-drop.min.js
928 ms
effect-explode.min.js
849 ms
ga.js
157 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
146 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff
382 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff
389 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff
395 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff
393 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff
395 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
392 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff
392 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff
389 ms
effect-fade.min.js
888 ms
effect-fold.min.js
749 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
745 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
744 ms
effect-size.min.js
765 ms
effect-scale.min.js
759 ms
__utm.gif
167 ms
effect-shake.min.js
620 ms
effect-slide.min.js
620 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
619 ms
plugins.js
834 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
631 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
671 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
662 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
661 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
661 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
655 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
703 ms
jquery.stretch.js
719 ms
imagesloaded.js
654 ms
TweenLite.min.js
637 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
796 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
796 ms
default_dynamic.js
796 ms
default.min.js
822 ms
custom_js.js
711 ms
comment-reply.min.js
712 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
712 ms
wp-embed.min.js
740 ms
waypoints.min.js
738 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
827 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
761 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
908 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
871 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
837 ms
selematic-logo.png
729 ms
ico_menu-cat-1.png
763 ms
ico_menu-cat-2-new.png
776 ms
ico_menu-cat-3.png
775 ms
ico_menu-cat-4.png
801 ms
ico_menu-cat-5.png
865 ms
ico_menu-cat-6.png
845 ms
ico_menu-cat-7.png
814 ms
ico_menu-cat-8.png
772 ms
selematic_spa_slide-01-1.jpg
1185 ms
Ellisse-1.png
797 ms
selemati_spa.png
837 ms
selematic_spa_home-mobile.jpg
1009 ms
ipack-ima-2022.jpg
971 ms
selematic_spa_azienda-01.jpg
900 ms
impianti_icona-60x60.png
806 ms
settori_merceologici_icona-60x60.png
843 ms
esperienza_icona-60x60.png
857 ms
innovazione_icona-60x60.png
870 ms
qualit%C3%A0_icona-60x60.png
2269 ms
incartonamento_icona_home_1-80x80.png
933 ms
carton_box-home-new-80x80.png
811 ms
impianti-di-fardellaggio-home-80x80.png
802 ms
monouso_icona_home-3-80x80.png
807 ms
controlli_peso_icona_home-80x80.png
976 ms
pallettizzazione_icona_home-80x80.png
906 ms
moduli_macchina_complementari-home-1-80x80.png
975 ms
moduli_macchina_complementari_icona_home-80x80.png
968 ms
selematic-logo-light.png
948 ms
background_home.jpg
1080 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
949 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
951 ms
contattaci_home_background_1.jpg
949 ms
loader.gif
111 ms
selematic.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
selematic.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
selematic.it SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selematic.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Italian language. Our system also found out that Selematic.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
selematic.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Selematic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: