9.4 sec in total
3 sec
6.1 sec
316 ms
Click here to check amazing SGEM content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sgem.org
SGEM Conference on Earth and Planetary Sciences, organized by SWS Scholarly Society Vienna
Visit sgem.orgWe analyzed Sgem.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
sgem.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.507
16/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
2980 ms
256 ms
264 ms
412 ms
555 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Sgem.org, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Sgem.org.
Page size can be reduced by 676.8 kB (31%)
2.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Sgem.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.5 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SGEM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 406.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sgem.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (51%)
102
50
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SGEM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sgem.org
2980 ms
rokbox-style.css
256 ms
grid-12.css
264 ms
gantry.css
412 ms
joomla.css
555 ms
joomla.css
561 ms
demo-styles.css
383 ms
template.css
504 ms
overlays.css
523 ms
typography.css
513 ms
fusionmenu.css
544 ms
roktabs.css
627 ms
module_default.css
643 ms
mootools-core.js
911 ms
core.js
675 ms
caption.js
685 ms
mootools-more.js
1388 ms
rokbox.js
1000 ms
rokbox-config.js
771 ms
gantry-rotator.js
812 ms
gantry-morearticles.js
824 ms
gantry-smartload.js
904 ms
gantry-buildspans.js
950 ms
gantry-inputs.js
965 ms
browser-engines.js
1036 ms
fusion.js
1042 ms
roktabs.js
1087 ms
acymailing_module.js
1105 ms
jquery.min.js
1250 ms
jquery.lightbox.css
1169 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
1175 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
ga.js
47 ms
logo.png
266 ms
header-bg.png
134 ms
menu.png
139 ms
menutop-daddy.png
130 ms
header-bg.png
143 ms
dropdown-daddy.png
143 ms
menu_sub.png
257 ms
1_rotator.jpg
658 ms
showcase-overlay2.png
276 ms
showcase-overlay.png
281 ms
showcase-preview.png
283 ms
hall.jpg
383 ms
plaque1.jpg
526 ms
albena_rotator13.jpg
547 ms
footer-trans.png
421 ms
shadow-l.png
423 ms
shadow-r.png
510 ms
rotator-controls.png
560 ms
scope.jpg
563 ms
readon-r.png
637 ms
readon-l.png
658 ms
join_2016.jpg
817 ms
scopus_sgem_title.jpg
699 ms
reg_2016.jpg
704 ms
rating_star.png
763 ms
topic_6.jpg
788 ms
menu_sub.jpg
789 ms
topic_5.jpg
838 ms
topic_4.jpg
844 ms
new_topic1.gif
889 ms
topic_3.jpg
919 ms
topic_2.jpg
921 ms
topic_1.jpg
952 ms
two-more%20weeks.jpg
976 ms
geo_new_topics.jpg
986 ms
scopus_2015.jpg
996 ms
collect
14 ms
__utm.gif
58 ms
online_reg_2016_date.jpg
926 ms
thomson.gif
925 ms
thomson_WOS.jpg
957 ms
thomson_2015.jpg
1255 ms
paper-130.jpg
988 ms
workshop_130.jpg
890 ms
gl.gif
923 ms
sl.gif
913 ms
br.gif
950 ms
facebook.jpg
989 ms
tweet.jpg
891 ms
linkedIn.jpg
898 ms
sgemlib_2.jpg
898 ms
impact_logo.jpg
857 ms
sgem@lib_.jpg
886 ms
tabbg-light.png
854 ms
tabbg-active-light.png
890 ms
tabbg-bottom-light.png
890 ms
tabbg-active-bottom-light.png
866 ms
readon-r.png
879 ms
readon-l.png
869 ms
body-arrow.png
852 ms
icon-check.png
878 ms
footer-bg.png
823 ms
moduleborder-r.png
852 ms
bullet2.png
864 ms
rokinputs.png
859 ms
blank.gif
853 ms
spinner.gif
868 ms
jquery-lightbox-theme.png
829 ms
prev-light.png
135 ms
next-light.png
134 ms
sgem.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sgem.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sgem.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sgem.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sgem.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sgem.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SGEM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: