17.7 sec in total
2.7 sec
14.8 sec
219 ms
Visit shaffa.ir now to see the best up-to-date Shaffa content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shaffa.ir
به مرکز درمان در منزل شفا طب عرفان خوش آمدید | ارائه کننده کلیه خدمات پزشکی و پرستاری در منزل هستش که مثل اسنپ نزدیک ترین پرسنل رو برای کاربر می فرسته
Visit shaffa.irWe analyzed Shaffa.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
shaffa.ir performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value22.2 s
0/100
10%
Value25.4 s
0/100
25%
Value26.0 s
0/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.12
84/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
2672 ms
374 ms
371 ms
370 ms
737 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Shaffa.ir, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Accounts.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Shaffa.ir.
Page size can be reduced by 829.6 kB (19%)
4.3 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Shaffa.ir main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shaffa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 404.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 404.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shaffa.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
72
27
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shaffa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.shaffa.ir
2672 ms
widget.css
374 ms
styles.css
371 ms
styles-rtl.css
370 ms
settings.css
737 ms
styles.css
373 ms
main.css
1271 ms
layout.css
724 ms
layout-rtl.css
725 ms
font-awesome.css
898 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
726 ms
woocommerce.css
1281 ms
woocommerce-rtl.css
1095 ms
style.css
1114 ms
jquery.js
2261 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1260 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2175 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2003 ms
owl.carousel.js
1976 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1804 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1967 ms
scripts.js
2327 ms
retina_1.3.0.js
2317 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
2339 ms
woocommerce.js
2352 ms
rtl.css
2695 ms
plusone.js
67 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2461 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2519 ms
scripts.js
2527 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
2553 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
2554 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2829 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
2889 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
2897 ms
core.min.js
2898 ms
widget.min.js
2908 ms
position.min.js
2920 ms
menu.min.js
3014 ms
autocomplete.min.js
3057 ms
portfolio.js
3067 ms
BYekan.woff
1338 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
logo1-copy-2zj8385c74hmff9st800sg@2x-307hwrwwkv095vyyy01pmo.png
839 ms
header.png
1290 ms
16.jpg
6926 ms
18.jpg
5759 ms
17.jpg
5459 ms
doc6-2ywbcb58j22ny6a89hdkw0.png
2204 ms
doc5-2ywbcaw6uh0ae2shhr09og.png
2232 ms
doc4-2ywbcan55vxwtzaqq0mygw.png
3224 ms
doc3-2ywbcae3havj9vszya9n9c.png
3466 ms
doc7-2ywbcbnbw87f2d9psy47b4.png
3666 ms
doc8-2ywbcbwdkt9smgrgkohiio.png
4719 ms
doc21-2ywbca51spt5psb96jwc1s.jpg
3836 ms
Fotolia_53239300_Subscription_XXL1-2ywbbvkc6rzbc5q4i2g9vk.jpg
4229 ms
work-time-2ywp2s4nlxtn0a44ce6uww.png
4201 ms
recent-posts-2ywpf8y5b1qa1ke86mkzr4.png
4572 ms
9-308hnfw2nvt7i4p8a3ml8g.jpg
4598 ms
Fotolia_39515068_Subscription_XL-2ywbbtjyedd35m4pm1nnk0.jpg
4941 ms
6-308hnevvxjjp9qq9765ce8.jpg
4966 ms
location-2ywpic0t5owqsg8woe0mio.png
5097 ms
last-news-2ywpguhup1uivs9ild9atc.png
5306 ms
Yekan.woff
5507 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6331 ms
admin-ajax.php
5559 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
14 ms
fastbutton
66 ms
loader.gif
4831 ms
ajax-loader.gif
4986 ms
postmessageRelay
61 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
19 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
39 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
38 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
shaffa.ir accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shaffa.ir best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
shaffa.ir SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shaffa.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Shaffa.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shaffa.ir
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shaffa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: