Tools & Wizards About Us
sigmasigmasigma.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

sigmasigmasigma.org

Default Web Site Page

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

690 ms

Page Rendered

269 ms

sigmasigmasigma.org screenshot

About Website

Visit sigmasigmasigma.org now to see the best up-to-date Sigmasigmasigma content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sigmasigmasigma.org

Visit sigmasigmasigma.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Sigmasigmasigma.org page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 959 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sigmasigmasigma.org performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sigmasigmasigma.org

53 ms

Home.mvc

77 ms

common.css

14 ms

jquery-1.4.1.js

65 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Sigmasigmasigma.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) belongs to the original domain Sigmasigmasigma.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 320.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sigmasigmasigma.org main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 70.0 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sigmasigmasigma images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 208.3 kB

  • Original 275.6 kB
  • After minification 183.2 kB
  • After compression 67.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sigmasigmasigma.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (55%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sigmasigmasigma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sigmasigmasigma.org

sigmasigmasigma.org

53 ms

Home.mvc

Home.mvc

77 ms

common.css

common.css

14 ms

jquery-1.4.1.js

jquery-1.4.1.js

65 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

31 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.2.1.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.2.1.pack.js

31 ms

ajaxHelpers.js

ajaxHelpers.js

30 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

29 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

33 ms

chili-1.7.pack.js

chili-1.7.pack.js

45 ms

Slideshow.js

Slideshow.js

44 ms

jquery.lwtCountdown-1.0.js

jquery.lwtCountdown-1.0.js

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

101 ms

jquery.cycle2.js

jquery.cycle2.js

45 ms

default.css

default.css

17 ms

gradient.gif

gradient.gif

56 ms

logo.png

logo.png

56 ms

foundation.gif

foundation.gif

51 ms

butShop.gif

butShop.gif

53 ms

iconSearch.png

iconSearch.png

51 ms

butContact.gif

butContact.gif

56 ms

butLogin.gif

butLogin.gif

56 ms

iconVid.png

iconVid.png

58 ms

iconHouse.gif

iconHouse.gif

56 ms

iconDots.gif

iconDots.gif

59 ms

link1898.gif

link1898.gif

55 ms

x.gif

x.gif

59 ms

boxArrow.gif

boxArrow.gif

57 ms

linkToday.gif

linkToday.gif

59 ms

linkAlumnae.gif

linkAlumnae.gif

58 ms

linkJoin.gif

linkJoin.gif

60 ms

linkEvents.gif

linkEvents.gif

59 ms

characterEdu.gif

characterEdu.gif

60 ms

archives.gif

archives.gif

130 ms

linkMeet.gif

linkMeet.gif

61 ms

2015traveler.jpg

2015traveler.jpg

130 ms

expansion_slider-01.jpg

expansion_slider-01.jpg

465 ms

PurpleandPearls.jpg

PurpleandPearls.jpg

129 ms

conventionlogo.jpg

conventionlogo.jpg

372 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

60 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

127 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

129 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

129 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

132 ms

billhighway.png

billhighway.png

131 ms

flickr.png

flickr.png

129 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

130 ms

butRead.png

butRead.png

131 ms

leftArrow.gif

leftArrow.gif

132 ms

NandEagle_Horiz_OYS_3C.jpg

NandEagle_Horiz_OYS_3C.jpg

143 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

scrollerbot.png

scrollerbot.png

95 ms

botDots.gif

botDots.gif

97 ms

sails.gif

sails.gif

101 ms

footerBack.gif

footerBack.gif

105 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

slide_off.png

slide_off.png

34 ms

Accessibility Review

sigmasigmasigma.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sigmasigmasigma.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sigmasigmasigma.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sigmasigmasigma.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Sigmasigmasigma.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

sigmasigmasigma.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sigmasigmasigma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: