3.1 sec in total
403 ms
2.3 sec
371 ms
Click here to check amazing Simply Skin content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about simply-skin.com
SimplySkin aesthetic medicine clinic offering advanced aesthetic medicine procedures at The Salon @ 167, 167 South Lane, New Malden, Surrey, KT3 5ES
Visit simply-skin.comWe analyzed Simply-skin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
simply-skin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
403 ms
31 ms
92 ms
183 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Simply-skin.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Simply-skin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 408.8 kB (12%)
3.4 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Simply-skin.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 295.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Simply Skin needs image optimization as it can save up to 295.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Simply-skin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (69%)
70
22
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Simply Skin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.simply-skin.com
403 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
92 ms
style.min.css
183 ms
layerslider.css
182 ms
css
21 ms
styles.css
185 ms
email-subscribers-public.css
185 ms
rs6.css
189 ms
style.css
188 ms
base.css
272 ms
layout.css
277 ms
shortcodes.css
282 ms
animations.min.css
275 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
287 ms
prettyPhoto.css
288 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
362 ms
responsive.css
365 ms
style.css
364 ms
css
19 ms
css
19 ms
jetpack.css
367 ms
frontend.min.js
376 ms
greensock.js
380 ms
jquery.js
457 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
455 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
454 ms
email-subscribers-public.js
487 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
488 ms
rs6.min.js
576 ms
js
74 ms
css
45 ms
scripts.js
544 ms
core.min.js
544 ms
widget.min.js
545 ms
mouse.min.js
545 ms
sortable.min.js
574 ms
tabs.min.js
657 ms
accordion.min.js
657 ms
plugins.js
730 ms
menu.js
658 ms
animations.min.js
703 ms
e-202404.js
38 ms
jplayer.min.js
704 ms
linkid.js
15 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
29 ms
js
50 ms
translate3d.js
641 ms
scripts.js
552 ms
comment-reply.min.js
548 ms
wp-embed.min.js
580 ms
collect
86 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
simply.png
216 ms
aesthetic-med-clinic-earlscourt-80x80.jpeg
217 ms
aesthetic-med-clinic-earlscourt.jpeg
280 ms
blue-white-gradient-wallpaper-3-80x80.png
217 ms
botox-treatment-area-epsom.jpg
373 ms
filler-treatment-area-epsom.jpg
601 ms
prp-vampire-facelift-area-epsom.jpg
511 ms
before-after-frown-treatment-london-960x750.png
921 ms
microneedling-before-after-960x750.png
1008 ms
vampire-face-lift-before-after-960x750.jpg
460 ms
textline.png
436 ms
blockquote.png
544 ms
stripes_3_b.png
545 ms
box_shadow_button.png
577 ms
mfn-icons.woff
611 ms
box_shadow.png
573 ms
loader.gif
491 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
496 ms
beautician_section.png
686 ms
beautician_skills.jpg
636 ms
simply-skin.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
simply-skin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
simply-skin.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Simply-skin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Simply-skin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
simply-skin.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Simply Skin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: