2 sec in total
272 ms
1.4 sec
379 ms
Welcome to sitemagic.org homepage info - get ready to check Sitemagic best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sitemagic.org
Create beautiful and functional websites with Sitemagic CMS - it's free and Open Source
Visit sitemagic.orgWe analyzed Sitemagic.org page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sitemagic.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
272 ms
96 ms
189 ms
200 ms
293 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Sitemagic.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) belongs to the original domain Sitemagic.org.
Page size can be reduced by 189.9 kB (75%)
253.9 kB
64.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sitemagic.org main page is 253.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 149.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 776 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sitemagic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 121.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sitemagic.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)
26
8
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sitemagic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sitemagic.org
272 ms
editor.css
96 ms
common.css
189 ms
json2.js
200 ms
SMClient.js
293 ms
gui.css
196 ms
style.css
194 ms
override.css
202 ms
menu.normal.js
281 ms
font-awesome.min.css
99 ms
all.css
95 ms
base.css
95 ms
header.css
101 ms
menu.css
98 ms
page.css
100 ms
cards.css
96 ms
snippets.css
98 ms
footer.css
187 ms
mobile.css
190 ms
menu.normal.js
96 ms
Sunset.jpg
465 ms
Logo.png
200 ms
Designer.jpg
518 ms
Facebook.png
98 ms
Twitter.png
98 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
sitemagic.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sitemagic.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
sitemagic.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sitemagic.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sitemagic.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sitemagic.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sitemagic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: