4.5 sec in total
982 ms
2.9 sec
586 ms
Welcome to slipalert.com homepage info - get ready to check Slip Alert best content right away, or after learning these important things about slipalert.com
SlipAlert slip testing machine. Coeeficient of friction measure. Tribometer. World's best slip testing. Quality HSE tested. Brititish Standard Slip test. UKSRG v3
Visit slipalert.comWe analyzed Slipalert.com page load time and found that the first response time was 982 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
slipalert.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value3,110 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
982 ms
81 ms
163 ms
236 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Slipalert.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) belongs to the original domain Slipalert.com.
Page size can be reduced by 89.9 kB (7%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Slipalert.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 726.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slip Alert images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 202 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slipalert.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (72%)
57
16
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slip Alert. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
slipalert.com
982 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
81 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
163 ms
style.min.css
236 ms
theme.min.css
239 ms
header-footer.min.css
242 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
244 ms
post-5.css
251 ms
frontend.min.css
251 ms
default.css
316 ms
swiper.min.css
318 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
322 ms
all.min.css
326 ms
v4-shims.min.css
324 ms
global.css
331 ms
post-2.css
395 ms
semantic.min.css
645 ms
style.css
418 ms
css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
493 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
415 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
419 ms
v4-shims.min.js
473 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
498 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
498 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
500 ms
animations.min.css
551 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
572 ms
semantic.min.js
744 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
577 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
587 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
629 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
674 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
741 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
742 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
822 ms
hooks.min.js
819 ms
i18n.min.js
820 ms
frontend.min.js
746 ms
waypoints.min.js
663 ms
core.min.js
591 ms
frontend.min.js
589 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
587 ms
css
31 ms
slipalert-svg-header.svg
166 ms
slipalert-header-who-are-we.jpg
168 ms
who-should-slip-alert.jpg
756 ms
machinery-image.jpg
819 ms
training-banner.jpg
625 ms
floor-safety-svg.svg
268 ms
slip-alert-car-svg.svg
269 ms
maintenancerepairs-svg.svg
271 ms
slipalert-testing-svg.svg
623 ms
training-svg.svg
625 ms
safecontractor.gif
625 ms
Avetta.png
754 ms
ferfa-logo.jpg
753 ms
ContractorTracker.jpg
754 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
543 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
543 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
592 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
591 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
591 ms
icons.woff
672 ms
vvwPIbmJleNpjYGKAAFYG7ICTgYGRiZGZkYWRlZGNkZ2Rg5GTLT2nsiDDEEIZsZfmZRqZujmDaDcDAxcI7WIOpS2gtCWUdgQAZkcSmQAAAAFblbO6AAA=
82 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff
508 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff
506 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCQ.woff
506 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff
508 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff
508 ms
slipalert.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
slipalert.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
slipalert.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slipalert.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slipalert.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slipalert.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Slip Alert. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: