Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

snappr.co

Snappr Photography | Powering the internet's photos

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

8.7 sec

Page Rendered

941 ms

snappr.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Snappr content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about snappr.co

On-demand photoshoots ✓ On-demand photo-editing ✓ Largest visual content creator network ✓ Build complex visual content workflows ✓ Used by 53% of the Fortune 500

Visit snappr.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Snappr.co page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snappr.co performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,100 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value117.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.snappr.com

94 ms

snappr-photography.ec0c67756.css

110 ms

webfont.js

137 ms

widget.js

209 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.dc5e7f18c8.js

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Snappr.co, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Perfalytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) relates to the external source Analytics.twitter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.1 MB (24%)

Content Size

54.5 MB

After Optimization

41.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Snappr.co main page is 54.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 51.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 12.9 MB

  • Original 51.9 MB
  • After minification 51.9 MB
  • After compression 38.9 MB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.9 MB or 25% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 176.3 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snappr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 188.4 kB
  • After minification 188.4 kB
  • After compression 183.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snappr.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (47%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snappr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snappr.co accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

snappr.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

snappr.co SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snappr.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Snappr.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snappr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: