6.3 sec in total
292 ms
5.7 sec
322 ms
Welcome to solarcompared.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Solar Compared best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about solarcompared.co.uk
Find info, costs and top suppliers of solar panels and green energy generation by Ecopreneurist
Visit solarcompared.co.ukWe analyzed Solarcompared.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
solarcompared.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
292 ms
594 ms
114 ms
365 ms
384 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Solarcompared.co.uk, 50% (48 requests) were made to Expertsure.com and 15% (14 requests) were made to Cdn.logiforms.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Expertsure.com.
Page size can be reduced by 840.7 kB (58%)
1.4 MB
608.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Solarcompared.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 817.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 199.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Solar Compared needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 439.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 439.2 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solarcompared.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (68%)
80
26
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solar Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
solarcompared.co.uk
292 ms
594 ms
style.min.css
114 ms
style.css
365 ms
style.css
384 ms
map.css
436 ms
style.css
408 ms
style_fix.css
435 ms
font-awesome.min.css
213 ms
base.css
299 ms
style.css
386 ms
styles_thumbnails.css
439 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.fadein.css
485 ms
a3_lazy_load.min.css
485 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
498 ms
solarrates_client.css
495 ms
jquery.min.js
193 ms
html5-min.js
754 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
441 ms
ui.anglepicker.js
779 ms
js
229 ms
solarrates.js
779 ms
lxm3rzg.js
239 ms
css
174 ms
css
193 ms
icon-fontawesome.css
757 ms
related.css
621 ms
shortcodes.css
759 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
757 ms
comment-reply.min.js
759 ms
core.js
760 ms
frontend.min.js
790 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js
790 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js
755 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js
790 ms
jquery-ui.touch.min.js
788 ms
general.js
788 ms
raphael.min.js
825 ms
map.js
970 ms
index.php
2862 ms
j.php
276 ms
gtm.js
363 ms
solar-expert.png
202 ms
trusted.png
212 ms
privacy.png
201 ms
cilents1.png
214 ms
cilents2.png
214 ms
cilents3.png
215 ms
cilents4.png
242 ms
cilents5.png
242 ms
cilents6.png
240 ms
cilents7.png
242 ms
lazy_placeholder.gif
243 ms
solar-hero.png
243 ms
formProxy-min.js
443 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
360 ms
v.gif
63 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
collect
28 ms
page1.html
1289 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
1822 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1802 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
1803 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1883 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
1965 ms
sdk.js
2072 ms
gen_204
1441 ms
font-awesome-min.css
1356 ms
base-min.css
1404 ms
common.css
1405 ms
PercentBar.css
1408 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
1554 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
1403 ms
logiform-min.js
1751 ms
alerts.min.js
1478 ms
d
116 ms
d
333 ms
d
330 ms
d
331 ms
d
331 ms
d
328 ms
d
332 ms
d
334 ms
sdk.js
93 ms
126 ms
p.gif
77 ms
down-arrow2.png
31 ms
start.png
46 ms
Eclipse-1s-200px.gif
312 ms
334105%20-%20add%20album%20camera%20galery%20gallrey%20graphic%20content%20im.png
80 ms
next.png
48 ms
compare-quotes.png
48 ms
translation-min.js
80 ms
cffp-min.js
81 ms
MultiPageForm-min.js
80 ms
PercentBar-min.js
82 ms
solarcompared.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
solarcompared.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
solarcompared.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solarcompared.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solarcompared.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
solarcompared.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Solar Compared. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: