14.2 sec in total
2.8 sec
11.1 sec
269 ms
Welcome to southernsemioticreview.net homepage info - get ready to check Southern Semiotic Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about southernsemioticreview.net
General subject matter and semiotic methodology, and special themes. Themes include media and video, religion, and arts.
Visit southernsemioticreview.netWe analyzed Southernsemioticreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
southernsemioticreview.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value7,150 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.4 s
1/100
10%
2797 ms
5728 ms
15 ms
41 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Southernsemioticreview.net, 21% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Southernsemioticreview.net.
Page size can be reduced by 996.9 kB (71%)
1.4 MB
412.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Southernsemioticreview.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 692.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Southern Semiotic Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 386.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 386.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 565.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Southernsemioticreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 565.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (86%)
43
6
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Southern Semiotic Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
southernsemioticreview.net
2797 ms
www.southernsemioticreview.net
5728 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
15 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
41 ms
otw-grid.css
44 ms
style.css
38 ms
fpw_styles.css
50 ms
skin.css
52 ms
counter-style.css
29 ms
dashicons.min.css
69 ms
frontend.css
60 ms
frontend_style.css
54 ms
wordpresscom-stats-smiley-remover.css
76 ms
multicolor-subscribe-widget.css
67 ms
css
45 ms
animate.min.css
79 ms
all.min.css
110 ms
v4-shims.min.css
72 ms
bootstrap.min.css
129 ms
style.css
101 ms
lightgallery.css
99 ms
social-icons.css
88 ms
onepress-plus.css
107 ms
jetpack.css
115 ms
column-style.css
134 ms
jquery.js
132 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
123 ms
flowplayer.min.js
132 ms
custom.js
126 ms
megamenu-wp.js
198 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
34 ms
frontend.js
261 ms
theme-all.min.js
263 ms
jquery.bully.js
260 ms
q2w3-fixed-widget.min.js
261 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
261 ms
slider.js
261 ms
onepress-plus.js
262 ms
wp-embed.min.js
263 ms
e-202403.js
38 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
25 ms
hero5.jpg
129 ms
crossref-e1544753823507.png
129 ms
Scopus%C2%AE_151_JPG-1-e1641384006806.jpg
128 ms
Screen-Shot-2021-07-17-at-10.13.18-pm.png
129 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
68 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
97 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
100 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
98 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
98 ms
southernsemioticreview.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
southernsemioticreview.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
southernsemioticreview.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Southernsemioticreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Southernsemioticreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
southernsemioticreview.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Southern Semiotic Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: