4.8 sec in total
211 ms
4 sec
607 ms
Visit sryde.com now to see the best up-to-date Sryde content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sryde.com
Finally realize profit and achieve your business goals with a tailored web presence. We don't just make you a website—we make you money.
Visit sryde.comWe analyzed Sryde.com page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sryde.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value58.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value113.5 s
0/100
10%
211 ms
705 ms
66 ms
132 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 168 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (131 requests) were addressed to the original Sryde.com, 10% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (7 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Sryde.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.6 MB (11%)
41.4 MB
36.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sryde.com main page is 41.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 40.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sryde needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.5 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sryde.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 122 (83%)
147
25
The browser has sent 147 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sryde. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 98 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sryde.com
211 ms
sryde.com
705 ms
flick.css
66 ms
style.min.css
132 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
190 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
192 ms
style.css
192 ms
font-awesome.min.css
195 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
style.css
198 ms
dripicons.css
252 ms
kiko-all.css
252 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
314 ms
stylesheet.min.css
392 ms
print.css
261 ms
style_dynamic_callback.php
495 ms
responsive.min.css
376 ms
style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php
462 ms
js_composer.min.css
428 ms
css
47 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
381 ms
style.css
452 ms
basic.min.css
452 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
464 ms
theme.min.css
500 ms
jquery.min.js
564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
518 ms
scrollTo.js
522 ms
jquery.form.min.js
529 ms
mailchimp.js
556 ms
core.min.js
562 ms
datepicker.js
584 ms
jquery.json.min.js
584 ms
gravityforms.min.js
593 ms
utils.min.js
620 ms
js
80 ms
65392.css
624 ms
js
132 ms
conversion.js
61 ms
accordion.min.js
623 ms
api.js
61 ms
menu.min.js
644 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
587 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
530 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
566 ms
dom-ready.min.js
502 ms
hooks.min.js
503 ms
i18n.min.js
519 ms
a11y.min.js
519 ms
autocomplete.min.js
529 ms
controlgroup.min.js
502 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
503 ms
button.min.js
516 ms
datepicker.min.js
464 ms
mouse.min.js
412 ms
resizable.min.js
433 ms
draggable.min.js
392 ms
dialog.min.js
366 ms
style.css
383 ms
droppable.min.js
534 ms
progressbar.min.js
541 ms
selectable.min.js
536 ms
sortable.min.js
532 ms
slider.min.js
502 ms
spinner.min.js
495 ms
tooltip.min.js
481 ms
tabs.min.js
477 ms
effect.min.js
471 ms
effect-blind.min.js
445 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
439 ms
effect-clip.min.js
439 ms
effect-drop.min.js
418 ms
effect-explode.min.js
418 ms
effect-fade.min.js
480 ms
effect-fold.min.js
453 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
450 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
450 ms
effect-size.min.js
429 ms
effect-scale.min.js
427 ms
effect-shake.min.js
418 ms
effect-slide.min.js
390 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
444 ms
doubletaptogo.js
424 ms
modernizr.min.js
421 ms
jquery.appear.js
411 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
386 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
386 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
443 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
422 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
520 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
510 ms
waypoints.min.js
487 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
485 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
526 ms
gtm.js
125 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
357 ms
skrollr.js
347 ms
TweenLite.min.js
347 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
352 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
346 ms
default_dynamic_callback.php
633 ms
default.min.js
446 ms
comment-reply.min.js
444 ms
ajax.min.js
445 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
444 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
444 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
629 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
628 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
628 ms
qode-slider-part.min.js
556 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
556 ms
carousel-part.min.js
622 ms
qode-like.min.js
622 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
622 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
619 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
619 ms
frontend.min.js
618 ms
long-logo-2.png
589 ms
11.jpg
721 ms
22.jpg
658 ms
33.jpg
717 ms
lovasi.png
587 ms
cehof-logo.png
587 ms
260 ms
151 ms
l2.png
597 ms
rtr-1.png
659 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
229 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
409 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
415 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
422 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
421 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
420 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
420 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
420 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
422 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
639 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJQ.ttf
424 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJQ.ttf
424 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDr0fJQ.ttf
424 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJQ.ttf
424 ms
382 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
623 ms
l1.png
556 ms
l7.png
622 ms
mimi.png
586 ms
c7.png
581 ms
l5.png
581 ms
l4.png
581 ms
skyscrap.jpg
660 ms
Blog-Photos-2.png
1695 ms
244 ms
Blog-Photos.png
1385 ms
website-speed.png
1423 ms
164 ms
74 ms
28 ms
recaptcha__en.js
97 ms
anchor
65 ms
styles__ltr.css
13 ms
recaptcha__en.js
16 ms
MxL-5nwwlOXLnw48P5Qma8MW4lQG7Q2rhXcL3r2wtjE.js
84 ms
webworker.js
82 ms
logo_48.png
72 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
7 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
7 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
7 ms
recaptcha__en.js
28 ms
sryde.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sryde.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sryde.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sryde.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sryde.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sryde.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sryde. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: