4.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.5 sec
269 ms
Welcome to ssl.support homepage info - get ready to check SSL best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ssl.support
We offer SSL Certificate Installation service on all types of web servers,C-Panel, Firewall, Load Balancer, UCC server, VPN server with CSR generation. You just need to buy any package and we will ins...
Visit ssl.supportWe analyzed Ssl.support page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ssl.support performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.187
65/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
1144 ms
328 ms
686 ms
86 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Ssl.support, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ssl.support.
Page size can be reduced by 87.4 kB (22%)
392.0 kB
304.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ssl.support main page is 392.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 197.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SSL needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (62%)
47
18
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ssl.support
1144 ms
www.ssl.support
328 ms
www.ssl.support
686 ms
gtm.js
86 ms
css
64 ms
bootstrap.min.css
55 ms
font-awesome.min.css
65 ms
main.css
125 ms
custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css
253 ms
menu-style.css
255 ms
custom.css
257 ms
compact.https.css
262 ms
step-process.css
257 ms
css
73 ms
css
78 ms
aos.css
61 ms
css
81 ms
aos.js
74 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
48 ms
bootstrap.min.js
70 ms
script.js
259 ms
uikit.min.js
265 ms
uikit-icons.min.js
396 ms
jquery.validate.js
266 ms
additional-methods.min.js
45 ms
api.js
137 ms
jquery.viewbox.min.js
263 ms
jquery.session.min.js
266 ms
bioep.min.js
267 ms
jquery.popupoverlay.js
394 ms
js
48 ms
css
17 ms
recaptcha__en.js
123 ms
logo.png
570 ms
box-bg.jpg
570 ms
1560517825.png
569 ms
1557309863.png
568 ms
1557310059.png
568 ms
1557310277.png
569 ms
1557309962.png
610 ms
1557309923.png
611 ms
popular.png
612 ms
free-ifetime-png1557313478.png
611 ms
provide-remote-png1557313513.png
612 ms
support-png1557313583.png
610 ms
assistance-png1557313612.png
651 ms
dedicated-png1557313656.png
658 ms
flexible-png1557313691.png
658 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
354 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
452 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf
496 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
496 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
497 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
29 ms
widget
842 ms
call-icon.png
232 ms
ssl.support accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
ssl.support best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ssl.support SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssl.support can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ssl.support main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ssl.support
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SSL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: