3.1 sec in total
282 ms
2.5 sec
334 ms
Visit standout.sa now to see the best up-to-date Stand Out content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about standout.sa
Stand Out - Website design company, Electronic Marketing and App design Company in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia also offers Comprehensive online services.
Visit standout.saWe analyzed Standout.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
standout.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value940 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.128
82/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
282 ms
625 ms
188 ms
284 ms
209 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Standout.sa, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) belongs to the original domain Standout.sa.
Page size can be reduced by 133.0 kB (24%)
557.8 kB
424.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Standout.sa main page is 557.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 325.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 132.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stand Out images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (67%)
55
18
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stand Out. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
standout.sa
282 ms
www.standout.sa
625 ms
fonts.css
188 ms
carousel.min.css
284 ms
style.min.css
209 ms
animate-animo.css
215 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
288 ms
styles.css
291 ms
contact-form-7-email-spam-blocker-public.css
291 ms
style.css
300 ms
theme.css
316 ms
custom.css
313 ms
css
28 ms
joinchat.min.css
383 ms
js_composer.min.css
606 ms
formreset.min.css
386 ms
formsmain.min.css
505 ms
readyclass.min.css
413 ms
browsers.min.css
412 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
486 ms
rs6.css
484 ms
wp-embed.min.js
506 ms
lazyload.min.js
510 ms
dummy.png
101 ms
VAGRounded-Light.woff
201 ms
fa.woff
198 ms
Logo02.png
97 ms
Logo02-1.png
144 ms
youtube.png
109 ms
youtube_hover.png
99 ms
twitter.png
194 ms
twitter_hover.png
213 ms
facebook.png
198 ms
facebook_hover.png
216 ms
linkedin.png
241 ms
linkedin_hover.png
252 ms
instagram.png
288 ms
instagram_hover.png
298 ms
mail.png
309 ms
mail_hover.png
315 ms
Mobiy-1.png
367 ms
pif-copy.png
360 ms
Kidana-copy-1.png
393 ms
abudawood1-copy.png
435 ms
Artboard-1.png
433 ms
arabiancement.png
428 ms
wataniya.png
473 ms
Screen-Shot-2023-11-06-at-4.13.03-PM.png
477 ms
Virgin-Megastore-Logo-1.png
499 ms
web-design_main1.png
832 ms
app_new.png
770 ms
logo.png
568 ms
behance.png
611 ms
twitter.png
606 ms
dribbble.png
616 ms
forrst.png
669 ms
gplus.png
721 ms
embed
202 ms
js
57 ms
standout.sa accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
standout.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
standout.sa SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standout.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Standout.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
standout.sa
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stand Out. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: