2.4 sec in total
12 ms
2 sec
450 ms
Visit starmail.com now to see the best up-to-date Star Mail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starmail.com
Visit starmail.comWe analyzed Starmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
starmail.com performance score
12 ms
160 ms
62 ms
40 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Starmail.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Seal.godaddy.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Starmail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 306.2 kB (15%)
2.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Starmail.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.8 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Star Mail needs image optimization as it can save up to 246.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (14%)
37
32
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Star Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
starmail.com
12 ms
www.starmail.com
160 ms
css
62 ms
font-awesome.min.css
40 ms
css
22 ms
modernizr
21 ms
jquery
40 ms
bigtext
36 ms
getSeal
408 ms
bootstrap
33 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
Kids-Watching-STARMAIL-sm.png
41 ms
Starmail-Logo.png
35 ms
how-it-works.png
77 ms
watch-sample-videos.jpg
33 ms
celebBanner.jpg
75 ms
how-to.png
90 ms
how-many-starmails.png
79 ms
581c863c-e90d-4bf7-93c3-1e81507c050f
87 ms
afc02e47-756b-4ca3-83a7-04acb56d124c
94 ms
e3ae8a08-104e-49dd-ad64-ddd5c8119ada
614 ms
9d994e99-889a-4b6c-97bf-8a810ebff02a
129 ms
ae9d40cc-1111-46a4-b7ac-70c7924c05f2
1120 ms
2aa3e95e-c4f9-4ceb-9d0f-3095955f8153
620 ms
bbd7c3fc-3b5c-4f44-80d0-4976a71ecddb
1662 ms
e5a19e0f-e259-4922-807a-12a4f224fd37
1136 ms
aa1d8456-1ef1-4f8c-9057-922176a78e10
127 ms
ef1b8848-7881-423f-a999-e668965cc2e6
128 ms
cf504c43-96aa-4464-8216-b75ef4622b7b
130 ms
no-profile-image.jpg
137 ms
717d7010-06a7-493a-b233-9748840f03a2
144 ms
bdc8e6a2-be84-4f6a-aa6f-19480cd35f81
159 ms
23d3049a-8845-49b3-bca9-83c515c3f329
164 ms
4049591c-d0c2-422c-adee-d48f10377e8a
176 ms
b1bbc9d4-aa1c-4a9f-be76-e2f0e1309ea8
180 ms
38714ea6-4237-4905-b208-71c3cb93470f
185 ms
Lw4J4XiH21tNmX0DzARuSA.woff
25 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3 ms
collect
59 ms
siteseal_gd_3_h_l_m.gif
62 ms
starmail.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Starmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starmail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Star Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: