10.7 sec in total
234 ms
10.2 sec
245 ms
Welcome to stockportfencing.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Stockport Fencing best content right away, or after learning these important things about stockportfencing.co.uk
Stockport Fencing Ltd, the North West's premier fencing manufacturer and installers. Supplying and installing a vast range of fencing.
Visit stockportfencing.co.ukWe analyzed Stockportfencing.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
stockportfencing.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value750 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
234 ms
2830 ms
306 ms
355 ms
443 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Stockportfencing.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Stockportfencing.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (87%)
2.4 MB
329.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Stockportfencing.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 179.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stockportfencing.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (96%)
92
4
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stockport Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stockportfencing.co.uk
234 ms
www.stockportfencing.co.uk
2830 ms
style.min.css
306 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
355 ms
woocommerce.css
443 ms
theme.min.css
272 ms
style.css
302 ms
style.min.css
301 ms
header-footer.min.css
369 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
503 ms
frontend.min.css
700 ms
swiper.min.css
410 ms
post-12019.css
449 ms
frontend.min.css
899 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
915 ms
all.min.css
624 ms
v4-shims.min.css
541 ms
global.css
1003 ms
post-2917.css
637 ms
post-2814.css
723 ms
post-11478.css
732 ms
css
42 ms
fontawesome.min.css
806 ms
solid.min.css
817 ms
pricing-table.css
825 ms
deals-table.css
942 ms
jquery.min.js
1023 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
942 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1022 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1035 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1037 ms
hooks.min.js
1036 ms
w.js
29 ms
underscore.min.js
1106 ms
wp-util.min.js
1117 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1103 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1122 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1109 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1125 ms
js
78 ms
wc-blocks.css
1195 ms
v4-shims.min.js
948 ms
frontend.js
909 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1002 ms
accounting.min.js
955 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
1004 ms
addons.min.js
960 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
927 ms
order-attribution.min.js
926 ms
react.min.js
873 ms
deprecated.min.js
906 ms
dom.min.js
823 ms
react-dom.min.js
825 ms
escape-html.min.js
759 ms
element.min.js
742 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
773 ms
i18n.min.js
697 ms
keycodes.min.js
757 ms
priority-queue.min.js
735 ms
compose.min.js
665 ms
private-apis.min.js
656 ms
redux-routine.min.js
658 ms
data.min.js
737 ms
lodash.min.js
664 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
648 ms
url.min.js
661 ms
api-fetch.min.js
661 ms
g.gif
13 ms
wc-settings.js
733 ms
data-controls.min.js
737 ms
html-entities.min.js
699 ms
notices.min.js
673 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
680 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
844 ms
dom-ready.min.js
776 ms
a11y.min.js
770 ms
primitives.min.js
683 ms
warning.min.js
704 ms
blocks-components.js
688 ms
blocks-checkout.js
711 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
643 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
653 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
692 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
719 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
745 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
677 ms
frontend.min.js
681 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
27 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf
34 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf
46 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
48 ms
waypoints.min.js
702 ms
core.min.js
726 ms
frontend.min.js
762 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
756 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
732 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
830 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
726 ms
eicons.woff
762 ms
www.stockportfencing.co.uk
1704 ms
2182 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
111 ms
stockportfencing.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
stockportfencing.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stockportfencing.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stockportfencing.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stockportfencing.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stockportfencing.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stockport Fencing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: