3.2 sec in total
359 ms
2.7 sec
222 ms
Visit stromvergleich.ws now to see the best up-to-date STROMVERGLEICH content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stromvergleich.ws
Stromvergleich: Kostenlos Strompreise vergleichen und Online Stromanbieter wechseln. Mit unserem Billig-Strom-Vergleich finden Sie die günstigsten Stromanbieter.
Visit stromvergleich.wsWe analyzed Stromvergleich.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
stromvergleich.ws performance score
359 ms
533 ms
199 ms
267 ms
280 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Stromvergleich.ws, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (856 ms) belongs to the original domain Stromvergleich.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 873.6 kB (50%)
1.8 MB
879.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Stromvergleich.ws main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 658.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STROMVERGLEICH images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 486.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 486.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 361.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stromvergleich.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 361.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (88%)
48
6
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STROMVERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stromvergleich.ws
359 ms
www.stromvergleich.ws
533 ms
bootstrap.min.css
199 ms
font-awesome.min.css
267 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
280 ms
global-style.css
391 ms
owl.carousel.css
287 ms
owl.theme.css
287 ms
sky-forms.css
294 ms
jquery.js
446 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
559 ms
modernizr.custom.js
379 ms
bootstrap.min.js
380 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
387 ms
jquery.easing.js
474 ms
jquery.metadata.js
475 ms
jquery.hoverup.js
481 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
482 ms
jquery.stellar.js
533 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
568 ms
jquery.dlmenu.autofill.js
569 ms
jquery.powerful-placeholder.min.js
576 ms
cusel.min.js
577 ms
jquery.form.min.js
621 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
650 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
662 ms
jquery.modal.js
663 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
671 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
673 ms
jquery.mixitup.js
710 ms
jquery.mixitup.init.js
741 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
759 ms
waypoints.min.js
757 ms
jquery.countTo.js
764 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
765 ms
rrssb.min.js
798 ms
jquery.nouislider.min.js
833 ms
owl.carousel.js
856 ms
tooltip.js
660 ms
popover.js
604 ms
wp.app.js
595 ms
css
26 ms
css
37 ms
animate.css
509 ms
rrssb.css
545 ms
easypiechart.css
569 ms
stromvergleich-logo.png
215 ms
full-bg-20.jpg
754 ms
stromvergleich.jpg
138 ms
stromrechner.jpg
138 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
10 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
18 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
261 ms
stromvergleich.ws SEO score
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stromvergleich.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stromvergleich.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stromvergleich.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of STROMVERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: