10.3 sec in total
2.1 sec
7.7 sec
446 ms
Welcome to studio237.com homepage info - get ready to check Studio 237 best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about studio237.com
Our world class hair salon serves clientele from the Belleville, Picton, and Trenton area. Come experience affordable luxury.
Visit studio237.comWe analyzed Studio237.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
studio237.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
2127 ms
42 ms
82 ms
99 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Studio237.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Studio237.com.
Page size can be reduced by 459.0 kB (18%)
2.6 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Studio237.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 259.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Studio 237 needs image optimization as it can save up to 259.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studio237.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (64%)
55
20
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio 237. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studio237.com
2127 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
82 ms
style.min.css
99 ms
styles.css
102 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
104 ms
style.css
230 ms
style.min.css
158 ms
css
29 ms
dashicons.min.css
174 ms
magnific_popup.css
1300 ms
swiper.css
138 ms
popup.css
145 ms
animate.css
181 ms
readmore.css
183 ms
jquery.min.js
218 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
214 ms
et-core-unified-1312-17059029041079.min.css
219 ms
api.min.js
19 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
263 ms
index.js
255 ms
page-preloader.js
256 ms
custom.unified.js
362 ms
common.js
266 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
340 ms
complianz.min.js
344 ms
wp-embed.min.js
300 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
345 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
363 ms
frontend.min.js
375 ms
gtm.js
119 ms
sbi-sprite.png
100 ms
AdobeStock_368597502-scaled.jpeg
319 ms
1-4.png
148 ms
2.png
253 ms
1.png
185 ms
3.png
186 ms
4.png
251 ms
AdobeStock_336723691-scaled-1.jpeg
295 ms
et-core-unified-1312-17059029041079.min.css
196 ms
studio237.com
1811 ms
Quentin.otf
239 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
81 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
111 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
111 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
111 ms
modules.ttf
195 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
216 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
216 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
250 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
265 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
284 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
266 ms
js
70 ms
2728.svg
108 ms
Copy-of-Untitled-22.png
101 ms
AdobeStock_165664556-scaled.jpeg
285 ms
1f49c.svg
104 ms
371346599_818495153288501_4839661215284983556_nlow.jpg
58 ms
355408277_781874500285836_2494836598573383896_nlow.jpg
56 ms
351755887_936068290807275_2699123984077995202_nlow.jpg
57 ms
350090923_1409167693176957_9074547923350254925_nlow.jpg
56 ms
348657772_245261364763058_9109168507851242479_nlow.jpg
86 ms
studio237.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
studio237.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
studio237.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studio237.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studio237.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studio237.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studio 237. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: