1.5 sec in total
96 ms
876 ms
540 ms
Visit swages.com now to see the best up-to-date Swages content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about swages.com
Visit swages.comWe analyzed Swages.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
swages.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value25.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
96 ms
158 ms
65 ms
80 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Swages.com, 75% (62 requests) were made to Supplysolutions.com and 18% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (394 ms) relates to the external source Supplysolutions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 200.8 kB (4%)
4.9 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Swages.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swages images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swages.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (68%)
65
21
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swages. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
swages.com
96 ms
supplysolutions.com
158 ms
style.min.css
65 ms
theme.min.css
80 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
116 ms
post-5.css
75 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
72 ms
swiper.min.css
81 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
100 ms
post-14.css
108 ms
post-116.css
111 ms
post-133.css
114 ms
css
34 ms
fontawesome.min.css
150 ms
solid.min.css
135 ms
jquery.min.js
179 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
149 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
156 ms
animations.min.css
156 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
159 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
169 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
229 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
230 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
231 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
232 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
233 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
235 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
291 ms
hooks.min.js
236 ms
i18n.min.js
237 ms
frontend.min.js
218 ms
waypoints.min.js
263 ms
core.min.js
269 ms
frontend.min.js
287 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
285 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
269 ms
underscore.min.js
286 ms
api.js
53 ms
wp-util.min.js
319 ms
frontend.min.js
285 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
274 ms
mailcheck.min.js
275 ms
punycode.min.js
267 ms
utils.min.js
269 ms
wpforms.min.js
295 ms
wpforms-modern.min.js
289 ms
cropped-SUPPLY-SOLUTIONS-LOGO.png
222 ms
FORKLIFT-OPERATION.png
386 ms
DSI-GATE-WEB.png
243 ms
Untitled-design-1.png
389 ms
DSI-CHECK.png
257 ms
PBV_6322_SEALW_HP_FLOAT_413.jpg
388 ms
PBV-Trunnion-Mounted-Ball-Valve-Forum-Energy.webp
369 ms
bray-butterfly.png
347 ms
LV-Logo-Full-Vertical-1024x557.png
368 ms
SMITH_HORIZONTAL-01.png
367 ms
DSI-LOGO-LOW-RES.jpg
382 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
84 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWAosBO5Xk.ttf
100 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
129 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUyosBO5Xk.ttf
149 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyo8BO5Xk.ttf
165 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVspcBO5Xk.ttf
121 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
129 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUypcBO5Xk.ttf
129 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyUbpcBO5Xk.ttf
131 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
130 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
131 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
145 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
145 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
146 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
146 ms
PBV-LOGO-LOW-RES-transparent.png
384 ms
ISV-sml.jpg
385 ms
logo-warren-valve.png
388 ms
bray-valve-logo.png
391 ms
controvalve-abz-en-1543964641.png
393 ms
submit-spin.svg
394 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
346 ms
hcaptcha.html
37 ms
hcaptcha.html
125 ms
hcaptcha.js
20 ms
swages.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
swages.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
swages.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swages.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swages.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
swages.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Swages. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: