2.2 sec in total
267 ms
1.7 sec
186 ms
Visit syntaxeg.com now to see the best up-to-date Syntaxeg content for Egypt and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about syntaxeg.com
Company for web design and development , Facebook applications and Mobile application and E-commerce
Visit syntaxeg.comWe analyzed Syntaxeg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
syntaxeg.com performance score
267 ms
382 ms
410 ms
284 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Syntaxeg.com, 69% (44 requests) were made to Syntax.com.eg and 5% (3 requests) were made to Speakpipe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) relates to the external source Syntax.com.eg.
Page size can be reduced by 690.0 kB (61%)
1.1 MB
446.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Syntaxeg.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 726.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Syntaxeg needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.3 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 481.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 481.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Syntaxeg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (30%)
61
43
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Syntaxeg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
syntaxeg.com
267 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
382 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
410 ms
jquery.cookie.js
284 ms
ajax.js
284 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
284 ms
style.css
284 ms
splash.css
351 ms
layout.css
352 ms
topmenu.css
464 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
559 ms
rotate.css
501 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
ga.js
9 ms
194476783brandloqta.png
198 ms
header_bg.jpg
197 ms
header_shape.png
200 ms
share_this_icon.png
188 ms
logo.jpg
199 ms
clients_login.png
186 ms
search.png
185 ms
web-app.png
238 ms
mob-app.png
247 ms
logo.png
244 ms
fb-app.png
241 ms
seo.png
261 ms
ecommerce.png
246 ms
logo_footer.png
285 ms
in.png
285 ms
t.png
287 ms
fb.png
296 ms
google.png
295 ms
rss.png
402 ms
114447003hiredroid.png
200 ms
subscribe_now.png
189 ms
contact_btn1.png
209 ms
contact_btn2.png
188 ms
contact_btn3.png
211 ms
contact_btn4.png
241 ms
contact_us.png
266 ms
accept.png
344 ms
Sansation_Regular.woff
346 ms
splash_shape.png
335 ms
splash-bg-hover.png
331 ms
cursor_drag_arrow.gif
333 ms
splash-bg.png
372 ms
box_bg.jpg
366 ms
box_top_bg.jpg
391 ms
box_shadow.png
368 ms
footer_bg.jpg
384 ms
footer_part.png
369 ms
h9nce5ns5l4r4dtpal9iocqx650pgidz.js
239 ms
300lo.json
51 ms
ui-bg_glass_0_d95e16_1x400.png
388 ms
ui-icons_ffffff_256x240.png
400 ms
ui-bg_flat_0_ffffff_40x100.png
401 ms
ui-bg_glass_0_ff7000_1x400.png
401 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
31 ms
pixel
18 ms
pixel
16 ms
tap.php
66 ms
4g0djh32yaimjogg.png
45 ms
label_mic_v.png
424 ms
mic-icon.png
82 ms
syntaxeg.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Syntaxeg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Syntaxeg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
syntaxeg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Syntaxeg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: