4.4 sec in total
303 ms
3.8 sec
311 ms
Visit test.sightmill.com now to see the best up-to-date TEST Sight Mill content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about test.sightmill.com
SightMill Net Promoter Score software makes it easy to measure and improve customer satisfaction and employee engagement by email, SMS, website, training events
Visit test.sightmill.comWe analyzed Test.sightmill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
test.sightmill.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value29,780 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value42.6 s
0/100
10%
303 ms
559 ms
86 ms
304 ms
561 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Test.sightmill.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 781.4 kB (53%)
1.5 MB
688.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Test.sightmill.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 628.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TEST Sight Mill needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 113.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.9 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 530.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.sightmill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 530.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (58%)
84
35
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TEST Sight Mill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
test.sightmill.com
303 ms
test.sightmill.com
559 ms
js
86 ms
bootstrap.min.css
304 ms
plugins.css
561 ms
main.css
474 ms
themes.css
331 ms
modernizr.min.js
331 ms
jquery.min.js
449 ms
bootstrap.min.js
479 ms
js
110 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
65 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
108 ms
inspectlet.js
191 ms
plugins.js
668 ms
app.js
474 ms
conversion_async.js
114 ms
79 ms
81 ms
css
33 ms
js
95 ms
fbevents.js
242 ms
qevents.js
412 ms
icon32.png
904 ms
b08e87f132e2df14e4a86c45c626d137.png
414 ms
home-page.png
415 ms
ask.png
223 ms
analyze.png
222 ms
act.png
222 ms
verbatim-meta.png
409 ms
the-aa-logo.png
223 ms
bride.jpg
412 ms
fastcase.png
410 ms
legalgeneral.png
411 ms
lexis.jpg
409 ms
mailzinger.png
456 ms
relx-logo.png
455 ms
skorch.jpg
455 ms
tolley.jpg
455 ms
uni-herts.png
599 ms
integrations2.png
455 ms
nps2.png
639 ms
308409680
466 ms
lftracker_v1_kn9Eq4RdvNj8RlvP.js
457 ms
152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.js
838 ms
analytics.js
289 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
383 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
418 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
509 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
469 ms
GMmPg1xfFO0
408 ms
2120523438196232
214 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
348 ms
467b1cff-8548-42e3-8ea1-a6f04a4c267a.js
335 ms
widget
1026 ms
ss.js
438 ms
collect
128 ms
www-player.css
102 ms
www-embed-player.js
100 ms
base.js
100 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
100 ms
tr.lfeeder.com
212 ms
collect
203 ms
GMmPg1xfFO0
160 ms
ServiceGetConfig
592 ms
www-player.css
44 ms
www-embed-player.js
81 ms
base.js
125 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
39 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
pdata
465 ms
koi
469 ms
152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.html
313 ms
ad_status.js
265 ms
id
188 ms
RyHSygdhfD3dME44-3NNtjQCjkAA9PJK5Mnnq9vnCgY.js
78 ms
embed.js
11 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
103 ms
website
215 ms
62842f9c304ded0ef5000aa6.js
215 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
30 ms
Create
184 ms
font-awesome.css
111 ms
outline_1c.png
84 ms
outline_3c.png
134 ms
outline_5c.png
156 ms
floatbutton1_764bf172fd710d0d540b777a5a05ab02_.css
219 ms
floatbutton1_ee71224b7a4031c47ac08e0c631591de_.js
218 ms
tagjs
13 ms
107 ms
adsct
131 ms
tap.php
66 ms
pixel
74 ms
bounce
12 ms
8 ms
cb
22 ms
sd
30 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
cb
19 ms
test.sightmill.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
test.sightmill.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
test.sightmill.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.sightmill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Test.sightmill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
test.sightmill.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TEST Sight Mill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: