4.9 sec in total
977 ms
3.5 sec
461 ms
Click here to check amazing Test Cloud content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about testcloud.io
Test IO delivers a full range of web, mobile, and IoT testing, delivered as a service.
Visit testcloud.ioWe analyzed Testcloud.io page load time and found that the first response time was 977 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
testcloud.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
977 ms
470 ms
96 ms
384 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Testcloud.io, 36% (30 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 29% (24 requests) were made to Test.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (977 ms) belongs to the original domain Testcloud.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (50%)
2.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Testcloud.io main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Test Cloud needs image optimization as it can save up to 170.0 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 924.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 924.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 173.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testcloud.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 173.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (35%)
74
48
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Cloud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
testcloud.io
977 ms
test.io
470 ms
normalize.css
96 ms
base.css
384 ms
js
79 ms
all.js
726 ms
gtm.js
140 ms
logo_testIO_header.png
99 ms
stage_sign.png
299 ms
Anja_02_openhair_pointing.png
723 ms
customer_logo_careerbuilder.png
605 ms
customer_logo_garmin.png
605 ms
customer_logo_wooga.png
605 ms
customer_logo_bmw.png
605 ms
customer_logo_redbull.png
603 ms
customer_logo_tout.png
719 ms
customer_logo_shutterstock.png
718 ms
wallpaper_clouddevices_blue_left.png
720 ms
wallpaper_clouddevices_blue_right.png
718 ms
stat_crashedapps.png
720 ms
visual_devices_small.png
810 ms
Visual_Bouncer_Boxer.png
906 ms
logo_testIO_footer.png
825 ms
visual_sign.png
816 ms
logo_efre.jpg
827 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
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
3 ms
collect
21 ms
widget_v2.135.js
32 ms
collect
468 ms
fbevents.js
642 ms
conversion.js
461 ms
hotjar-115142.js
466 ms
3355640152.js
528 ms
notifications-en.json
231 ms
ga-audiences
67 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
34 ms
event
44 ms
95 ms
common.js
20 ms
map.js
41 ms
util.js
83 ms
marker.js
82 ms
onion.js
30 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
86 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
123 ms
stats.js
59 ms
controls.js
59 ms
infowindow.js
20 ms
mapmarker.png
197 ms
transparent.png
36 ms
css
175 ms
visit-data
335 ms
google4.png
49 ms
mapcnt6.png
108 ms
sv5.png
161 ms
tmapctrl.png
92 ms
cb_scout5.png
139 ms
tmapctrl4.png
136 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
112 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
167 ms
vt
194 ms
vt
167 ms
vt
166 ms
vt
167 ms
vt
165 ms
vt
171 ms
vt
168 ms
vt
171 ms
vt
168 ms
vt
170 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
59 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
74 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
106 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
106 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
28 ms
testcloud.io accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
testcloud.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
testcloud.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testcloud.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Testcloud.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
testcloud.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test Cloud. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: