4.3 sec in total
337 ms
3.3 sec
684 ms
Welcome to testvergleiche.org homepage info - get ready to check Testvergleiche best content right away, or after learning these important things about testvergleiche.org
✅ Entdecken und vergleichen Sie die aktuellen Produkt Testsieger bei Testvergleiche.org ✅ Testsieger online vergleichen und kaufen ✅
Visit testvergleiche.orgWe analyzed Testvergleiche.org page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
testvergleiche.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value330 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.083
94/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
337 ms
609 ms
117 ms
341 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Testvergleiche.org, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Testvergleiche.org.
Page size can be reduced by 204.9 kB (18%)
1.2 MB
957.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Testvergleiche.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 886.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 204.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testvergleiche images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)
33
30
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testvergleiche. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
testvergleiche.org
337 ms
testvergleiche.org
609 ms
jquery.min.js
117 ms
autoptimize_4d1dc13d048b163d247bad422ae45046.php
341 ms
testvergleiche-1.png
189 ms
Juanita-Mulder-Agnali-neu2.jpg
631 ms
drogerie.jpg
306 ms
Freizeit-1.jpg
442 ms
garten.jpg
447 ms
haushalt.jpg
336 ms
heimwerken.jpg
444 ms
technik.jpg
417 ms
tierwelt.jpg
556 ms
wohnen.jpg
527 ms
barman-drinks-bottom-decor-1920x47.png
554 ms
Concord90-neu.jpg
662 ms
Free-Photos.jpg
666 ms
barman-drinks-bottom-decor-1920x47neu1.png
638 ms
Unbenannt-2.jpg
773 ms
Baby-Kostw%C3%A4rmer.jpg
664 ms
Tipizelt.jpg
740 ms
Rollator.jpg
748 ms
Kehrmaschjne.jpg
772 ms
Hoverboard.jpg
775 ms
Haargl%C3%A4tter.jpg
775 ms
Forsthelm.jpg
850 ms
Duschtempel.jpg
857 ms
Damenrasierer.jpg
882 ms
Bartwachs.jpg
883 ms
Badheizk%C3%B6rper.jpg
886 ms
barman-footer-decor.png
887 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
42 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
63 ms
mfn-icons.woff
1136 ms
autoptimize_cbd0b60e90d13ab42d04fd2ffdb87c9c.php
232 ms
mfn-icons.ttf
317 ms
autoptimize_single_1267e2b97ad3e9ccdd1b6a39df663ada.php
120 ms
icons.woff
338 ms
mfn-icons.svg
305 ms
autoptimize_single_953f94779f5ae871f5669c6b4bb84a71.php
116 ms
autoptimize_single_d9666fa6770b0f46ce851c56bef7a122.php
113 ms
testvergleiche.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
testvergleiche.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
testvergleiche.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testvergleiche.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testvergleiche.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
testvergleiche.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Testvergleiche. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: