Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

texturetechnologies.com

Texture Technologies: Texture Analysis Instruments for Foods, Pharmaceuticals, Adhesives, Cosmetics and more | Texture Technologies

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

202 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

texturetechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Visit texturetechnologies.com now to see the best up-to-date Texture Technologies content for Malaysia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texturetechnologies.com

Texture Technologies - Texture Analysis, Texture Analyzers, and Texture Measurement Instruments for university research and product testing.

Visit texturetechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Texturetechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texturetechnologies.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50,850 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value65.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texturetechnologies.com

202 ms

texturetechnologies.com

876 ms

jquery.min.js

79 ms

bootstrap.min.css

109 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Texturetechnologies.com, 23% (12 requests) were made to Texturetechnologies.imgix.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Texturetechnologies.imgix.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 876.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

934.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Texturetechnologies.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 893.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 849.3 kB

  • Original 893.9 kB
  • After minification 698.7 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 195.2 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 849.3 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 613.9 kB
  • After minification 601.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texture Technologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 281.1 kB
  • After minification 281.1 kB
  • After compression 276.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texturetechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (50%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texture Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

texturetechnologies.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

texturetechnologies.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

texturetechnologies.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texturetechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Texturetechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texture Technologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: