5 sec in total
629 ms
4 sec
336 ms
Welcome to thereview.ca homepage info - get ready to check The Review best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about thereview.ca
Serving Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec since 1893
Visit thereview.caWe analyzed Thereview.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
thereview.ca performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.986
2/100
15%
Value23.3 s
1/100
10%
629 ms
72 ms
141 ms
139 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Thereview.ca, 7% (9 requests) were made to Btn.weather.ca and 4% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Btn.weather.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 937.9 kB (38%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Thereview.ca main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 396.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 439.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thereview.ca needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 439.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (65%)
129
45
The browser has sent 129 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 46 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thereview.ca
629 ms
normalize.css
72 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
141 ms
jquery-ui.shout.css
139 ms
sitefront.css
137 ms
anythingslider.css
139 ms
theme-carousel-shoutcms.css
134 ms
noscript.css
141 ms
responsive.css
199 ms
patch.css
208 ms
override.css
268 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
279 ms
jquery-migrate-quiet.js
210 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
211 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
415 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
270 ms
shout.js
274 ms
member.js
277 ms
jquery.anythingslider.js
337 ms
jquery.anythingslider.fx.js
336 ms
jquery.anythingslider.video.js
345 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
345 ms
swfobject.js
347 ms
jquery.watermarkinput.js
402 ms
productoptions.js
403 ms
minicart.js
413 ms
store.js
414 ms
common.js
414 ms
bootstrap.min.js
533 ms
shout-bootstrap.min.js
473 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
bootstrap.css
357 ms
less.css
296 ms
fontsheet.css
302 ms
general.css
342 ms
layout.css
349 ms
user-input.css
368 ms
images.css
368 ms
header.css
407 ms
footer.css
407 ms
breadcrumb.css
413 ms
pager.css
419 ms
ratings.css
424 ms
main-navigation.css
424 ms
sub-navigation.css
469 ms
carousel.css
464 ms
gallery.css
469 ms
editor.css
474 ms
banners.css
422 ms
features.css
423 ms
forms.css
462 ms
comments.css
462 ms
system.css
467 ms
news.css
415 ms
store.css
417 ms
system-general.css
67 ms
search.css
109 ms
members.css
110 ms
login.css
109 ms
profile.css
111 ms
transactions.css
110 ms
store-general.css
122 ms
category.css
162 ms
item.css
162 ms
minicart.css
163 ms
checkout.css
163 ms
ga.js
11 ms
img-search.png
97 ms
get_image.aspx
672 ms
logo.png
94 ms
Hawkesbury%20Toyota_WebBanner_TheReview%20copy.png
93 ms
CAA%20Banner%20468x60.jpg
303 ms
TMK_9march2016_shawarma%20sign%204xcol.jpg.b48e77e0.jpg
304 ms
budget.jpg.1853b465.jpg
305 ms
Threshing.png.c8f6e9d1.jpg
241 ms
vkhfair2015.png.1b064b08.jpg
242 ms
vhkhillca_banner%20copy.png.0e2b6877.jpg
242 ms
WebsiteDesign.jpg.3317dd29.jpg
304 ms
The%20Review%20Newspaper%20logo.png.4f026c26.jpg
304 ms
ANROID%20APP%20THE%20REVIEW%20SM.png
305 ms
APPLE%20APP%20THE%20REVIEW%20SM.png
307 ms
Print%20button%202015%20copy.jpg
308 ms
Edition%20button%202015%20copy.jpg
396 ms
vkh%20commercial%20fair%202016%20button.jpg
396 ms
Employment%20Services%20Centre%20March1915_Draft2.png
397 ms
WinterGreen%20Magazine%202015%201.jpg
589 ms
Discover%20Guide%202016%20cover%20small.jpg
1157 ms
logo-footer.png
395 ms
img-facebook.png
424 ms
img-twitter.png
427 ms
youtube%20copy.png
427 ms
img-linkin.png
435 ms
image004.png
516 ms
plusone.js
231 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
Submitted_7%20hour%20ambulance%20wait_Angela%20Smith_Leona%20Thomas%20Dewar_Virginia%20Dewar_colour.jpg.a18e068b.jpg
585 ms
file171270248831%201.jpg.d78441b0.jpg
507 ms
IMG_dalkeith%201.jpg.1f565f33.jpg
508 ms
LS_Derick%20Pancake%20Day%2016March2016_4%20x%20col_3.jpg.1bd0b763.jpg
819 ms
SourceSansPro-Light.woff
585 ms
SourceSansPro-Regular.woff
655 ms
SourceSansPro-Bold.woff
585 ms
SourceSansPro-Semibold.woff
687 ms
SourceSansPro-ExtraLight.woff
633 ms
ca-pub-3491318151127530.js
104 ms
zrt_lookup.html
101 ms
show_ads_impl.js
48 ms
template5.php
2105 ms
counter.js
55 ms
ads
242 ms
osd.js
98 ms
t.php
188 ms
__utm.gif
89 ms
dc.js
92 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
60 ms
arrows-minimalist-prev.png
442 ms
arrows-minimalist-next.png
495 ms
ads
231 ms
m_js_controller.js
37 ms
abg.js
51 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
70 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
34 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
53 ms
14076113954109633847
27 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
5 ms
weatherbuttons.js
27 ms
wbtn_150x90.css
53 ms
counter.gif
94 ms
referer.gif
33 ms
logo.gif
50 ms
fullforecast.gif
54 ms
a.gif
53 ms
swirl.gif
52 ms
search_en.gif
33 ms
thereview.ca accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thereview.ca best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thereview.ca SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thereview.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Thereview.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thereview.ca
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: