5.1 sec in total
715 ms
3.8 sec
579 ms
Visit thetapack.com now to see the best up-to-date Thetapack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thetapack.com
Paketleme, dizme, taşıyıcı ve otomasyon sistemleri alanlarında; genç, dinamik, yenilikçi mühendis ekibiyle ar-ge ve mühendislik hizmetleri vermektedir.
Visit thetapack.comWe analyzed Thetapack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 715 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
thetapack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value30.6 s
0/100
25%
Value31.1 s
0/100
10%
Value4,560 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.16
73/100
15%
Value29.4 s
0/100
10%
715 ms
1065 ms
500 ms
718 ms
525 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Thetapack.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Thetapack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 922.7 kB (21%)
4.4 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Thetapack.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thetapack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 349.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 483.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thetapack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 483.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (35%)
75
49
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thetapack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thetapack.com
715 ms
www.thetapack.com
1065 ms
bootstrap.min.css
500 ms
animate.css
718 ms
owl.carousel.css
525 ms
font-awesome.css
619 ms
themify-icons.css
617 ms
flaticon.css
513 ms
rs6.css
588 ms
prettyPhoto.css
614 ms
shortcodes.css
813 ms
main.css
688 ms
responsive.css
801 ms
thetapack-logo.png
714 ms
tr.png
713 ms
en.png
786 ms
slider-1.jpg
1139 ms
slider-2.jpg
1266 ms
slider-3.jpg
1161 ms
24924868352232022.jpg
965 ms
57583254572232022.jpg
976 ms
39951723822232022.jpg
968 ms
492495302232022.jpg
975 ms
88381594422532022.jpg
974 ms
33994692572232022.jpg
1139 ms
92551821472232022.jpg
1138 ms
95467776062232022.jpg
1139 ms
78748720882232022.jpg
1159 ms
47666567562532022.jpg
1186 ms
74905031922232022.jpg
1184 ms
6672304872232022.jpg
1186 ms
33607119322232022.jpg
1125 ms
8195132022232022.jpg
1133 ms
18243044622432022.jpg
1189 ms
4575747262232022.jpg
1192 ms
13508242372232022.jpg
1189 ms
69569033382232022.jpg
1224 ms
js
94 ms
jquery.min.js
1242 ms
tether.min.js
1023 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1010 ms
jquery.easing.js
1011 ms
jquery-waypoints.js
954 ms
jquery-validate.js
989 ms
owl.carousel.js
988 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
990 ms
css
51 ms
css
64 ms
numinate.min.js
914 ms
lazysizes.min.js
903 ms
main.js
894 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
1132 ms
rs6.min.js
1120 ms
slider.js
1105 ms
10485476262232022.jpg
883 ms
46300905942232022.jpg
880 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
44 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
90 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
94 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
96 ms
themify.woff
875 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
873 ms
27567690612232022.jpg
873 ms
91360110042232022.jpg
872 ms
18146914252232022.jpg
789 ms
3622072942232022.jpg
711 ms
72190493342232022.jpg
699 ms
28660219912232022.jpg
806 ms
23424929382232022.jpg
804 ms
73823183772232022.jpg
802 ms
45185488462232022.jpg
780 ms
14225405462232022.jpg
778 ms
45989626652232022.jpg
779 ms
22039431342232022.jpg
748 ms
24917238952232022.jpg
738 ms
63039797542232022.jpg
705 ms
5064028512232022.jpg
685 ms
49007815122232022.jpg
685 ms
77386111022232022.jpg
682 ms
55903261902432022.jpg
742 ms
60055178402232022.jpg
661 ms
thetapack-footer-logo.png
625 ms
footerbg.jpg
615 ms
thetapack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thetapack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thetapack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
TR
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thetapack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thetapack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thetapack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thetapack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: