5.3 sec in total
757 ms
3.8 sec
726 ms
Click here to check amazing ThinkIN content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thinkin.io
Scopri il valore della location intelligence e i vantaggi del conoscere in tempo reale la posizione di risorse e persone all'interno di uno spazio indoor.
Visit thinkin.ioWe analyzed Thinkin.io page load time and found that the first response time was 757 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
thinkin.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value2,550 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
757 ms
94 ms
55 ms
67 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkin.io, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Thinkin.io.
Page size can be reduced by 370.7 kB (7%)
5.7 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Thinkin.io main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 222.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ThinkIN images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkin.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (35%)
51
33
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ThinkIN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thinkin.io
757 ms
gtm.js
94 ms
css2
55 ms
jquery.js
67 ms
jquery.easing.js
94 ms
jquery.validate.js
694 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js
83 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
83 ms
bootstrap.min.css
86 ms
tiny-slider.css
1351 ms
main-css.css.v638420829645783174
317 ms
main-js.js.v638420829645783174
553 ms
stub.js
49 ms
iubenda_cs.js
65 ms
gsap.min.js
61 ms
ScrollTrigger.min.js
75 ms
api.js
194 ms
js
61 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
147 ms
icona-menu-tecnologie.png
147 ms
icona-menu-soluzioni.png
147 ms
testata-industry-ottimizzata.jpg
853 ms
testata-industry-mobile.png
329 ms
testata-retails-otimizzata.webp
623 ms
testata-retails-mobile.png
511 ms
testata-healthcare-ottimizzata.webp
796 ms
estata-healthcare-mobile-ottimizzata.webp
829 ms
tavola-1-thinkin_tavola-webp_disegno-1.webp
844 ms
tavola-2-thinkin_tavola-disegno-1.png
667 ms
tavola-3-thinkin_tavola-disegno-1.png
773 ms
tavola-4-thinkin_tavola-disegno-1.png
857 ms
la-soluzione-thinkin-in-1-min-5.png
1129 ms
tavola-1-thinkin_tavola-disegno-1.webp
1069 ms
dettaglio-industry.webp
1092 ms
dettaglio-healthcare.webp
975 ms
icona-1.webp
984 ms
icona-2.webp
996 ms
icona-3.png
1134 ms
demo_def.webp
1131 ms
asset-tracking-in-manufacturing.png
1367 ms
shutterstock_2025webp_14299.webp
1206 ms
various-different-euros-background.jpg
1511 ms
webp_23_freepik_973.webp
1353 ms
2c1.jpg
1396 ms
175.jpg
1331 ms
donna-di-vista-laterale-che-lavora-al-computer-portatile.jpg
1576 ms
technology_1717.jpg
1516 ms
h-chart-stock-market-graphic-webp_diagram.webp
1512 ms
recaptcha__en.js
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
120 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
182 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
196 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
234 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
234 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
234 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
235 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
234 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
233 ms
track.js
103 ms
thinkin.io accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thinkin.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
thinkin.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkin.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkin.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thinkin.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ThinkIN. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: