Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

tigerfish.com

Tigerfish Transcribing: Transcription Services

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

tigerfish.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tigerfish.com homepage info - get ready to check Tigerfish best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tigerfish.com

Discover why Tigerfish has been a leader in transcription services for over 20 years.

Visit tigerfish.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigerfish.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigerfish.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigerfish.com

271 ms

css

25 ms

style.css

126 ms

webform.css

132 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css

143 ms

Our browser made a total of 194 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (177 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerfish.com, 4% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigerfish.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigerfish.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 109.5 kB

  • Original 129.3 kB
  • After minification 119.6 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 506.4 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tigerfish needs image optimization as it can save up to 506.4 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 537.4 kB

  • Original 796.4 kB
  • After minification 793.9 kB
  • After compression 259.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 537.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerfish.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (11%)

Requests Now

186

After Optimization

166

The browser has sent 186 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tigerfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tigerfish.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tigerfish.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tigerfish.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerfish.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerfish.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tigerfish. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: