5.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.1 sec
321 ms
Click here to check amazing Tigerpak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tigerpak.co.uk
Providing polystyrene and foam packaging solutions, general packaging supplies and polystyrene construction materials. Call for a free quote.
Visit tigerpak.co.ukWe analyzed Tigerpak.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
tigerpak.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value19.9 s
0/100
25%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
Value13,000 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.146
77/100
15%
Value28.3 s
0/100
10%
1430 ms
364 ms
221 ms
215 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Tigerpak.co.uk, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Tigerpak.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 336.7 kB (48%)
695.4 kB
358.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tigerpak.co.uk main page is 695.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 268.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tigerpak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigerpak.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)
33
13
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tigerpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tigerpak.co.uk
1430 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
364 ms
styles.css
221 ms
layout.css
215 ms
oik.css
212 ms
style.css
351 ms
layout.css
283 ms
prettyPhoto.css
455 ms
jquery.js
788 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
535 ms
third-party.js
538 ms
general.js
540 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
666 ms
enable-lightbox.js
634 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
841 ms
featured-slider.js
747 ms
css
22 ms
blue.css
809 ms
shortcodes.css
921 ms
custom.css
862 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1076 ms
scripts.js
1069 ms
cards.png
331 ms
tiger-logo-24.png
431 ms
backgroundgreen3.jpg
354 ms
tigerpakpoly-1024x346.jpg
377 ms
tigerpakpoly1.jpg
560 ms
love401.jpg
635 ms
packing.jpg
622 ms
tigerpak.jpg
714 ms
businesswoman-3-1305806-m.jpg
619 ms
ga.js
32 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
22 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
22 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
collect
58 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
375 ms
tigerpak.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tigerpak.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
tigerpak.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigerpak.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tigerpak.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tigerpak.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tigerpak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: