Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

tlr-arf.org

Animal Rescue Foundation - A Second Chance for Pets

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

689 ms

tlr-arf.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tlr Arf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tlr-arf.org

Located in Walnut Creek, California, the Animal Rescue Foundation (ARF) helps shelter animals find forever homes and a second chance at love.

Visit tlr-arf.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Tlr-arf.org page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tlr-arf.org performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tlr-arf.org

152 ms

www.arflife.org

455 ms

style.css

166 ms

lk.css

181 ms

stylecore.php

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tlr-arf.org, 42% (38 requests) were made to Arflife.org and 12% (11 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) relates to the external source Arflife.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 700.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

9.7 MB

After Optimization

9.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Tlr-arf.org main page is 9.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 71.2 kB

  • Original 84.9 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 8.5 MB
  • After minification 8.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tlr Arf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 553.1 kB

  • Original 979.5 kB
  • After minification 960.8 kB
  • After compression 426.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 553.1 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 78.8 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tlr-arf.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (58%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tlr Arf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tlr-arf.org accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

tlr-arf.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tlr-arf.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tlr-arf.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tlr-arf.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tlr Arf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: