4.1 sec in total
644 ms
2.3 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Tomdoyletalk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tomdoyletalk.com
Visit tomdoyletalk.comWe analyzed Tomdoyletalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 644 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tomdoyletalk.com performance score
644 ms
238 ms
163 ms
161 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Tomdoyletalk.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (644 ms) belongs to the original domain Tomdoyletalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.5 kB (46%)
570.7 kB
309.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Tomdoyletalk.com main page is 570.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 232.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tomdoyletalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 123.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.3 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomdoyletalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (58%)
83
35
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tomdoyletalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tomdoyletalk.com
644 ms
style.css
238 ms
header-default.css
163 ms
content-default.css
161 ms
sociable.css
163 ms
jquery.js
446 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
165 ms
sociable.js
250 ms
vuible.js
250 ms
addtofavorites.js
250 ms
arclite.js
251 ms
plusone.js
44 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
wpaudio.min.js
242 ms
wp-embed.min.js
244 ms
counter_xhtml.js
25 ms
ga.js
29 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
plusone.js
90 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
151 ms
Screenshot.407761.1000001.jpg
143 ms
Download
222 ms
pixy.gif
67 ms
noimg_10_80_80.jpg
67 ms
header-bg.jpg
141 ms
header-center.jpg
218 ms
search-bg.png
143 ms
search-go.png
142 ms
nav-left.png
143 ms
nav-bg.png
141 ms
nav-div.png
217 ms
main-bg.jpg
217 ms
main-top.jpg
217 ms
main-center.jpg
217 ms
date-bg.png
217 ms
date-top.gif
440 ms
post-info.png
440 ms
simple-smile.png
441 ms
zemified_e.png
63 ms
pixy.gif
65 ms
Download
265 ms
Download
217 ms
240331793_80_80.jpg
66 ms
noimg_2_80_80.jpg
68 ms
zrt_lookup.html
16 ms
show_ads_impl.js
55 ms
share.ttf
629 ms
union.ttf
492 ms
ads
401 ms
tag.gif
320 ms
comment.png
399 ms
osd.js
96 ms
ads
571 ms
ads
454 ms
ads
309 ms
ads
410 ms
ads
388 ms
ads
391 ms
div-h.png
252 ms
box-shadow.png
252 ms
box-left-bg.png
251 ms
box-right-bg.png
346 ms
box-tr.png
346 ms
box-bl.png
346 ms
box-tl.png
348 ms
box-br.png
345 ms
box-title-left.png
439 ms
box-title-bg.png
438 ms
div-h2.gif
437 ms
rss.png
444 ms
t.php
310 ms
soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js
285 ms
wpaudio-play.png
292 ms
nav-active.png
326 ms
m_js_controller.js
39 ms
abg.js
57 ms
favicon
73 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
66 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
26 ms
s
41 ms
x_button_blue2.png
30 ms
favicon
38 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
11 ms
favicon
50 ms
wpaudio-pause.png
82 ms
tomdoyletalk.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomdoyletalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tomdoyletalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tomdoyletalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tomdoyletalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: