2.7 sec in total
16 ms
2.5 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing Touristeye content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about touristeye.com
City guides with offline maps, curated by experts. Download it today.
Visit touristeye.comWe analyzed Touristeye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
touristeye.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.178
68/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
16 ms
632 ms
1257 ms
24 ms
868 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Touristeye.com, 31% (8 requests) were made to Touristeye-static.s3.amazonaws.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Touristeye-static.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 848.3 kB (61%)
1.4 MB
546.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Touristeye.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 931.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Touristeye images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 653.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 653.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touristeye.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)
22
7
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touristeye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
touristeye.com
16 ms
www.touristeye.com
632 ms
c1413139761648.css
1257 ms
css
24 ms
router.js
868 ms
routing
225 ms
modernizr.js
80 ms
selectivizr.js
209 ms
LAB.min.js
7 ms
messages.en.js
92 ms
jsapi
20 ms
mixpanel-2.2.min.js
8 ms
6 ms
logo-dark.png
243 ms
home.jpg
19 ms
js
47 ms
ga.js
20 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
collect
175 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
underscore-min.js
4 ms
backbone-min.js
4 ms
m1413139761648B.js
23 ms
addthis_widget.js
7 ms
all.js
326 ms
touristeye.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
touristeye.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
touristeye.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touristeye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Touristeye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
touristeye.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Touristeye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: