1.5 sec in total
146 ms
1.1 sec
339 ms
Click here to check amazing TPFUG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tpfug.com
Your description
Visit tpfug.comWe analyzed Tpfug.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
tpfug.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.11
87/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
146 ms
105 ms
68 ms
81 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Tpfug.com, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (483 ms) belongs to the original domain Tpfug.com.
Page size can be reduced by 288.0 kB (10%)
2.8 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Tpfug.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TPFUG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 159.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.3 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tpfug.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 41% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)
64
36
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TPFUG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tpfug.com
146 ms
bootstrap.css
105 ms
style.css
68 ms
animate.css
81 ms
camera.css
115 ms
touchTouch.css
88 ms
font-awesome.css
73 ms
jquery.js
155 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
113 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
115 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
123 ms
jquery.equalheights.js
134 ms
camera.js
167 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
142 ms
touchTouch.jquery.js
146 ms
js
39 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
197 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
203 ms
sForm.js
182 ms
wow.js
183 ms
device.min.js
196 ms
bootstrap.min.js
195 ms
tm-scripts.js
218 ms
css
17 ms
css
29 ms
slash.png
92 ms
marker.png
91 ms
logo.png
92 ms
page1_pic1.jpg
131 ms
page1_pic2.jpg
185 ms
page1_pic3.jpg
261 ms
page1_pic4.jpg
194 ms
page1_pic5.jpg
181 ms
page1_pic6.jpg
376 ms
page1_pic7.jpg
201 ms
page1_icon4.png
241 ms
more2.png
235 ms
m-american.png
274 ms
m-amex.gif
264 ms
m-amtrak.gif
290 ms
m-citib.gif
302 ms
m-citif.gif
292 ms
m-delta.jpg
389 ms
m-DXC_Technology.png
347 ms
m-ibm.gif
322 ms
m-irs.gif
334 ms
m-klm.gif
358 ms
m-marriot.jpg
430 ms
m-sabre.gif
366 ms
m-sncf.gif
415 ms
m-travelport.png
387 ms
m-united.png
434 ms
m-visa.gif
413 ms
prev.png
436 ms
next.png
443 ms
device.min.js
483 ms
superfish.js
444 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
458 ms
jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js
462 ms
jquery.stellar.js
468 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
472 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
8 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
16 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
22 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM3OwRmPg.ttf
20 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4mE3OwRmPg.ttf
22 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4g03OwRmPg.ttf
21 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tM3OwRmPg.ttf
21 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4lM2OwRmPg.ttf
47 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4o0wOwRmPg.ttf
33 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4rQwOwRmPg.ttf
32 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4tMwOwRmPg.ttf
33 ms
4UaZrEtFpBI4f1ZSIK9d4LjJ4vowOwRmPg.ttf
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
447 ms
camera-loader.gif
59 ms
picture1_750p.jpg
33 ms
top.png
66 ms
picture3_750p.jpg
74 ms
tpfug.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tpfug.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tpfug.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tpfug.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tpfug.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tpfug.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TPFUG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: