2.8 sec in total
180 ms
2.6 sec
109 ms
Welcome to tracktalk.net homepage info - get ready to check Track Talk best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tracktalk.net
A private discussion forum for United States Track & Field and Cross Country.
Visit tracktalk.netWe analyzed Tracktalk.net page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
tracktalk.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.315
37/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
180 ms
263 ms
258 ms
210 ms
170 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Tracktalk.net, 15% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.viglink.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Tracktalk.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (77%)
3.8 MB
896.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Tracktalk.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Track Talk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.7 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tracktalk.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (62%)
21
8
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Track Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tracktalk.net
180 ms
www.tracktalk.net
263 ms
login
258 ms
desktop_6b56e3b04932fdb9ec9a23358f9a9f15f277e309.css
210 ms
7e202ef2-56d7-47d5-98d8-a9c8d15e57dd.css
170 ms
preload_store-d16a3675434b5a0043157cfc2b850471.js
149 ms
en-1c9ac18f3d5718ec9908877351ab5b74.js
294 ms
vendor-b5cbcb5fda5854930f43e81b5d12ee3b.js
525 ms
application-40b17f16c0bb27dae6d6107e2b1a3933.js
674 ms
browser-update-169efe1457d973249f2d03fbb3b17f82.js
232 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
report_js_error
584 ms
ga.js
13 ms
counter.js
13 ms
collect
555 ms
t.php
558 ms
vglnk.js
551 ms
login.html
240 ms
56b381d5d366ebdac9f633b9a1fcbe38cd1cf8a5.png
118 ms
grippie-d28a6f65e22c0033dcf0d63883bcc590.png
119 ms
fontawesome-webfont-638d2e4dd983a1b3b6f46e1aa637e938.woff
225 ms
5a7e0f70785917a4101e6c8c6cb573ac6d07550a.jpg
76 ms
pixel.gif
14 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
pixel.gif
7 ms
5a7e0f70785917a4101e6c8c6cb573ac6d07550a.jpg
223 ms
tracktalk.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tracktalk.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
tracktalk.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracktalk.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tracktalk.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracktalk.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Track Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: