3 sec in total
451 ms
2.2 sec
355 ms
Visit traffictechnology.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Traffictechnology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about traffictechnology.co.uk
Traffic Technology Ltd, Pedestrian counting, Radar, Speed Displays, Smiley SID, Speed Indication Displays, Eco Counter, SDR, Speed Detection Radar
Visit traffictechnology.co.ukWe analyzed Traffictechnology.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Traffictechnology.co.uk rating and web reputation
traffictechnology.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value15.3 s
0/100
25%
Value26.7 s
0/100
10%
Value10,260 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.203
61/100
15%
Value23.4 s
1/100
10%
451 ms
175 ms
179 ms
263 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Traffictechnology.co.uk, 6% (4 requests) were made to I-sight.info and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Traffictechnology.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 324.0 kB (13%)
2.4 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Traffictechnology.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Traffictechnology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Traffictechnology.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (51%)
68
33
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traffictechnology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
traffictechnology.co.uk
451 ms
light.css
175 ms
mod_lofarticlesslideshow.css
179 ms
mootools.js
263 ms
caption.js
181 ms
validate.js
189 ms
script.js
192 ms
mod_lofarticlesslideshow_jl15x.js
260 ms
system.css
272 ms
general.css
273 ms
layout.css
290 ms
template.css
291 ms
menu.css
349 ms
module.css
347 ms
superfish.css
350 ms
jquery.js
442 ms
jquery.event.hover.js
377 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
378 ms
supersubs.js
433 ms
superfish.js
438 ms
jquery.easing.1.2.js
432 ms
jquery.anythingslider.js
471 ms
slimbox2.css
472 ms
slimbox2.js
519 ms
tips.js
520 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
icon-twitter.png
656 ms
icon-linkedin.png
657 ms
footer-tel.png
673 ms
footer-email.png
673 ms
search_bg.png
100 ms
blank.png
88 ms
logo.png
520 ms
selective.png
607 ms
slider_004.jpg
352 ms
sdr_slide.jpg
475 ms
slider_001.jpg
516 ms
carm_sid.jpg
857 ms
selective.png
441 ms
slider_004.jpg
531 ms
sdr_slide.jpg
570 ms
slider_001.jpg
603 ms
carm_sid.jpg
606 ms
loading.gif
618 ms
sw_01.png
665 ms
sw_02.png
774 ms
sw_03.png
696 ms
g3main.png
866 ms
css_banner.png
965 ms
at.png
760 ms
vm.png
783 ms
16a.png
849 ms
header_outer_bg.gif
853 ms
active.gif
864 ms
menu_divider.gif
943 ms
load-indicator.gif
946 ms
transparent_bg.png
940 ms
arrow-bg.png
932 ms
grad-bg.png
934 ms
traffictechnology.co.uk
1149 ms
content_bg.gif
1023 ms
show-hide.png
1026 ms
box-white-br.gif
1017 ms
box-white-bl.gif
1019 ms
box-white-tr.gif
1030 ms
box-white-tl.gif
1104 ms
__utm.gif
44 ms
sep_horiz.gif
1049 ms
green_arrow.png
1051 ms
shadow.png
800 ms
traffictechnology.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
traffictechnology.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
traffictechnology.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traffictechnology.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Traffictechnology.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
traffictechnology.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traffictechnology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: