3.1 sec in total
595 ms
2.3 sec
170 ms
Welcome to trigraphyapp.com homepage info - get ready to check Trigraphy App best content right away, or after learning these important things about trigraphyapp.com
Trigraphy helps you turn everyday pictures into extraordinary works of art with limitless customization, artistic filters, incredible presets, fine tuning and high resolution exports.
Visit trigraphyapp.comWe analyzed Trigraphyapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 595 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
trigraphyapp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
37/100
10%
595 ms
212 ms
333 ms
341 ms
341 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Trigraphyapp.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.w.org and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (948 ms) belongs to the original domain Trigraphyapp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.6 kB (14%)
467.3 kB
402.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Trigraphyapp.com main page is 467.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 178.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trigraphy App images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 237 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 833 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trigraphyapp.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (80%)
49
10
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trigraphy App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
trigraphyapp.com
595 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
212 ms
style.min.css
333 ms
classic-themes.min.css
341 ms
theme.min.css
341 ms
style.css
350 ms
style.min.css
349 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
355 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
450 ms
swiper.min.css
455 ms
post-4661.css
453 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
465 ms
post-2279.css
466 ms
post-2786.css
473 ms
post-2809.css
567 ms
fontawesome.min.css
680 ms
solid.min.css
566 ms
brands.min.css
583 ms
js
58 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
583 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
507 ms
animations.min.css
663 ms
jquery.min.js
732 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
668 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
668 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
669 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
732 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
745 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
846 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
747 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
748 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
835 ms
hooks.min.js
831 ms
i18n.min.js
832 ms
frontend.min.js
857 ms
waypoints.min.js
866 ms
core.min.js
946 ms
frontend.min.js
948 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
833 ms
js
65 ms
analytics.js
103 ms
fbevents.js
135 ms
logo-trigrphy.png
345 ms
temp-art.jpg
702 ms
Trigraphy-Awards.svg
363 ms
logo-trigraphy.png
438 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
620 ms
eicons.woff
635 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
657 ms
collect
48 ms
1f60a.svg
27 ms
2b50.svg
27 ms
1f44d.svg
28 ms
trigraphyapp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
trigraphyapp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
trigraphyapp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trigraphyapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trigraphyapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trigraphyapp.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trigraphy App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: