2.4 sec in total
19 ms
1.6 sec
772 ms
Click here to check amazing Typesafe content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about typesafe.com
Lightbend helps digital businesses build, secure, and operate low-latency APIs, microservices, and data streams. Our customers create massively concurrent, highly transactional cloud systems for digit...
Visit typesafe.comWe analyzed Typesafe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
typesafe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value3.6 s
59/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
19 ms
144 ms
28 ms
825 ms
817 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Typesafe.com, 81% (43 requests) were made to D3gnpvjw8j16uq.cloudfront.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (854 ms) relates to the external source D3gnpvjw8j16uq.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 337.6 kB (38%)
880.0 kB
542.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Typesafe.com main page is 880.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 401.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Typesafe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 255.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 255.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 527 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typesafe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 527 B or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (48%)
29
15
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typesafe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
typesafe.com
19 ms
www.lightbend.com
144 ms
css
28 ms
836625e5ecabdada6dd84787e0f72a16-normalize.css
825 ms
ee9b8f5024ef0fc2fedadf7514f040cf-foundation.min.css
817 ms
c92ea72421e5087e95cbae5b5dbfe5d1-main.min.css
819 ms
da2c1b8dc967ad0e19eb25638216cdc6-modernizr.min.js
854 ms
f513029ac7e1024e884f3ee8005f4796-slick.css
821 ms
7f9fb969ce353c5d77707836391eb28d-jquery.min.js
815 ms
327df78f44606d22a4ffdf83eabda999-fastclick.js
823 ms
9d5d1e25d464d447ea4d5f80d5aea23a-foundation.min.js
820 ms
81d2a2e70ff6bc0e1a79f3d3203dd82c-main.min.js
821 ms
d3e2d6e7887add1872c197bab95a16b7-retina.js
848 ms
9ab828daa22009d6bf0994c5d75c5e9f-slick.min.js
848 ms
addthis_widget.js
15 ms
ee9b8f5024ef0fc2fedadf7514f040cf-foundation.min.css
85 ms
7f9fb969ce353c5d77707836391eb28d-jquery.min.js
95 ms
c92ea72421e5087e95cbae5b5dbfe5d1-main.min.css
96 ms
f513029ac7e1024e884f3ee8005f4796-slick.css
91 ms
836625e5ecabdada6dd84787e0f72a16-normalize.css
91 ms
9d5d1e25d464d447ea4d5f80d5aea23a-foundation.min.js
88 ms
81d2a2e70ff6bc0e1a79f3d3203dd82c-main.min.js
106 ms
327df78f44606d22a4ffdf83eabda999-fastclick.js
105 ms
d3e2d6e7887add1872c197bab95a16b7-retina.js
82 ms
9ab828daa22009d6bf0994c5d75c5e9f-slick.min.js
81 ms
da2c1b8dc967ad0e19eb25638216cdc6-modernizr.min.js
81 ms
analytics.js
118 ms
lightbend-color-reverse.svg
94 ms
lightbeam.jpg
99 ms
lagom-slider.jpg
97 ms
839892568b0c4c0b312ba156fb35d781-name-change-panel.png
86 ms
report-going-reactive-2016.jpg
87 ms
white-paper-fast-data-big-data-evolved.jpg
88 ms
white-paper-microservices-in-production.jpg
89 ms
white-paper-intro-reactive-akka-streams-akka-http.jpg
89 ms
video-typesafe-reactive-platform.jpg
93 ms
video-how-is-typesafe-reactive.jpg
93 ms
37637fe316eb36ce1a3bd529b2e0eefa-clients.png
94 ms
839892568b0c4c0b312ba156fb35d781-name-change-panel.png
78 ms
report-going-reactive-2016.jpg
79 ms
white-paper-fast-data-big-data-evolved.jpg
76 ms
white-paper-microservices-in-production.jpg
78 ms
white-paper-intro-reactive-akka-streams-akka-http.jpg
74 ms
video-typesafe-reactive-platform.jpg
75 ms
video-how-is-typesafe-reactive.jpg
74 ms
37637fe316eb36ce1a3bd529b2e0eefa-clients.png
71 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
35 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
178 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
179 ms
linkid.js
28 ms
munchkin.js
140 ms
ajax-loader.gif
114 ms
banner-curve.png
59 ms
typesafe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
typesafe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
typesafe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typesafe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Typesafe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
typesafe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Typesafe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: