3.6 sec in total
367 ms
2.5 sec
661 ms
Visit ugem.design now to see the best up-to-date UGEM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ugem.design
UGEM is a web design company that delivers outstanding user experiences through research-driven approach and technology.
Visit ugem.designWe analyzed Ugem.design page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ugem.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value1.9 s
98/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value6.3 s
60/100
10%
367 ms
20 ms
59 ms
2130 ms
445 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Ugem.design, 14% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ugem.design.
Page size can be reduced by 47.5 kB (4%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Ugem.design main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 923.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UGEM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ugem.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (27%)
15
11
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UGEM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ugem.design
367 ms
application-0450902ed1afacea381a40aa421f050ecb5353b552874332a91b6ed796a2ccc6.css
20 ms
gtm.js
59 ms
milanstyle_1385-73acf0b194e9b2ff1ee8f25ba3faa13d6e642981d09c4ec4bbb1557ee635d77d.png
2130 ms
homepage-66db6a88c4cbd630cfbd886ec0db4ce2c3eb1027801ad42923a45f5ef6852253.js
445 ms
image_1920_1x-363cf8b687f323fb172db7df3e999beae08165a54731e3510e321bb74974f2e3.png
471 ms
image_915-eb3a2c85750593c4b45df95da0271cde77549fa0ab4a0b11ca162a7c07ee2407.png
655 ms
rubygarage_1613-df44a7b47cf160872ac0dba54c924ee42bde814d6c91c6e1c0b119ce996464d6.png
564 ms
image_1310-23cb9166f9f1f27cf10f168463ec5e2ad9232bf97715756a5b26cb1329be849a.png
333 ms
image_964-7f6cd85e2d1bcdd339fa8a8e437a17f1e55fa1198ff32ed95c06d8db70b7d5b1.png
854 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
destination
99 ms
collect
24 ms
500-7cf21dae8754ffb1f7f93f5469d1a55e454f392d6cba5a9b0e883dbe93c796cb.woff
649 ms
400-9562914d1813fe7e7883726f5585359885a87bfb064f9fb50fc6946081c271ac.woff
691 ms
300-e45712eaacb1150adae8205b382e8010648508d95e800226b6fd7011a9fcf492.woff
1148 ms
600-6feba33cf62ae22f23700316d616210e20bca2e1f1a08d0088a87fe01fcb1509.woff
872 ms
700-e86a37fa246738d929f1157a0758ce467c83f25831c63e851fd641504df6624b.woff
1279 ms
icomoon-be353f44b5a57b735472b9d03d21ae49132ca0da9dd457b64e0907ad9d3f9caa.woff
960 ms
collect
83 ms
js
49 ms
ga-audiences
30 ms
ugem.design accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ugem.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ugem.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ugem.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ugem.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ugem.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of UGEM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: