9.1 sec in total
2.5 sec
5.2 sec
1.4 sec
Visit ulric.net now to see the best up-to-date Ulric content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ulric.net
Web Design | Websites, SEO, Google Marketing, Google Ad Management, Virus Removal, Hosting, Used & New Laptops & PCs - Norfolk & Suffolk - Diss & Harleston
Visit ulric.netWe analyzed Ulric.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ulric.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
2471 ms
91 ms
176 ms
250 ms
255 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Ulric.net, 10% (9 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ulric.net.
Page size can be reduced by 363.1 kB (15%)
2.3 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ulric.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 190.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ulric images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 209 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 612 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ulric.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (59%)
79
32
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ulric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ulric.net
2471 ms
style.min.css
91 ms
styles.css
176 ms
style.min.css
250 ms
theme.min.css
255 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
256 ms
post-91.css
254 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
269 ms
swiper.min.css
275 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
332 ms
post-86.css
339 ms
post-126.css
343 ms
post-114.css
343 ms
css
37 ms
fontawesome.min.css
354 ms
solid.min.css
367 ms
regular.min.css
415 ms
brands.min.css
424 ms
jquery.min.js
509 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
422 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
438 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
458 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
497 ms
trustindex-google-widget.css
502 ms
animations.min.css
504 ms
index.js
672 ms
index.js
672 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
680 ms
api.js
41 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
674 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
674 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
680 ms
index.js
680 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
680 ms
loader.js
20 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
704 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
680 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
844 ms
hooks.min.js
770 ms
i18n.min.js
804 ms
frontend.min.js
720 ms
waypoints.min.js
637 ms
core.min.js
564 ms
frontend.min.js
605 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
609 ms
logo.svg
97 ms
AATXAJzB2_f4AZLpbel6eWjUAd-KEE_VGpd_PqX5mqsu=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
128 ms
AATXAJxkfl7goFjJ19Mj7IaOBY7hqNH9WPDTJIhu_gMp=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
96 ms
AATXAJyNdxCGl8P8X4w-dRr2wtlrPISGR9r-vgchzyuM=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
96 ms
AATXAJyvDC3TX9EN08hG3KhK1tTD5OagYnRhmyQqVG-M=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
95 ms
AATXAJxiuH2AN7DHe8ueAPkBC84ESQn0YFc0rGNHVosV=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
97 ms
AATXAJzu9xCr7CJaaww46HCZ6nj2asePLnQcq9R9-JYs=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
95 ms
AATXAJzWQntuLRN5YwL9OWXmWEfSwcV1ZSV9G4VO9H3k5w=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
98 ms
AATXAJw1-mKD2o5Q7d6nDzu0NHVFucqFYZzgBcPS4u3f=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
98 ms
AATXAJzkuUNvNzwLDydqFkpIpVdj-ADy70ItQ_5xIe9T=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
100 ms
logo-1.png
256 ms
slider015.jpg
536 ms
web-design-concepts-1024x683.png
677 ms
cover-gradient_optimized.jpg
395 ms
umi-mask-icon-8@4x-8.png
321 ms
umi-mask-icon-6@4x-8.png
328 ms
umi-mask-icon-14@4x-8.png
340 ms
umi-mask-icon-13@4x-8.png
404 ms
umi-mask-icon-9@4x-8.png
412 ms
umi-mask-icon-10@4x-8.png
424 ms
JD-239x300.png
565 ms
Denny-Precision-dennyprecision.co_.uk_-178x300.jpg
488 ms
Style-Joy-Wedding-Boutique-In-Norfolk-styleandjoyboutique.co_.uk_-177x300.jpg
494 ms
BressinghamHall-226x300.png
677 ms
ELOH-300x280.png
655 ms
DT-190x300.png
660 ms
Carter-Energy-254x300.png
628 ms
f.svg
82 ms
icon.svg
88 ms
e.svg
89 ms
HuttieHire-243x300.png
683 ms
EasyClean-172x300.png
666 ms
David-Hoffman-208x300.png
684 ms
LaurelPartnership-234x300.png
688 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
735 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
37 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
69 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
90 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
92 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
90 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
91 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
92 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
92 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
699 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
792 ms
TerenceBlacker-265x300.png
793 ms
ulric.png
792 ms
ehyo72mvv5ganq2nugk8hxd4bbnbrwpd.js
156 ms
ulric.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ulric.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ulric.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ulric.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ulric.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ulric.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ulric. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: