3 sec in total
675 ms
2.1 sec
232 ms
Visit ultraprecision.org now to see the best up-to-date Ultra Precision content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultraprecision.org
The EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Ultra Precision is a collaboration between Cranfield University and the University of Cambridge, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Resear...
Visit ultraprecision.orgWe analyzed Ultraprecision.org page load time and found that the first response time was 675 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ultraprecision.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.134
80/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
675 ms
366 ms
86 ms
158 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Ultraprecision.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ultraprecision.wpengine.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (719 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultraprecision.org.
Page size can be reduced by 126.1 kB (27%)
466.2 kB
340.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ultraprecision.org main page is 466.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 198.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultra Precision images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultraprecision.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (83%)
59
10
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Precision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ultraprecision.org
675 ms
www.ultraprecision.org
366 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
86 ms
Blue_ios.css
158 ms
MapListProCore.css
163 ms
Blue_ios.css
164 ms
js_composer_front.css
165 ms
style.min.css
167 ms
styles.css
188 ms
cli-style.css
232 ms
events_manager.css
237 ms
bootstrap.min.css
264 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
253 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
style.css
333 ms
responsive.css
259 ms
jquery.min.js
407 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
PrettyFileList.js
328 ms
cookielawinfo.js
328 ms
core.min.js
398 ms
mouse.min.js
400 ms
sortable.min.js
506 ms
datepicker.min.js
510 ms
menu.min.js
506 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
508 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
524 ms
dom-ready.min.js
548 ms
hooks.min.js
550 ms
i18n.min.js
550 ms
a11y.min.js
551 ms
autocomplete.min.js
552 ms
resizable.min.js
567 ms
draggable.min.js
565 ms
controlgroup.min.js
587 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
586 ms
button.min.js
585 ms
dialog.min.js
595 ms
events-manager.js
634 ms
scripts.js
570 ms
js_composer_front.js
719 ms
love-it.js
712 ms
jquery.cookie.js
710 ms
bootstrap.min.js
711 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
687 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
698 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
658 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
652 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
626 ms
view.min.js
634 ms
functions.js
608 ms
comment-reply.min.js
577 ms
ultra-precision-logo.png
237 ms
header-shadow.png
196 ms
home-box-research.jpg
282 ms
home-box-facilities.jpg
290 ms
home-box-events.jpg
291 ms
home-box-news.jpg
292 ms
partner-logos.png
289 ms
social-icons-mono-light.png
287 ms
ultra-precision-logo.png
160 ms
analytics.js
86 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
90 ms
ultraprecision.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ultraprecision.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ultraprecision.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultraprecision.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultraprecision.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ultraprecision.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ultra Precision. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: