5.6 sec in total
596 ms
4.9 sec
101 ms
Visit upstackers.com now to see the best up-to-date Upstackers content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about upstackers.com
Visit upstackers.comWe analyzed Upstackers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
upstackers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
596 ms
1148 ms
463 ms
1249 ms
801 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Upstackers.com, 69% (69 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.odoocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Upstackers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 79.7 kB (19%)
421.3 kB
341.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Upstackers.com main page is 421.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 226.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.0 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Upstackers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upstackers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)
12
9
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upstackers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
upstackers.com
596 ms
upstackers.com
1148 ms
web.assets_common.min.css
463 ms
web.assets_frontend.min.css
1249 ms
web.assets_common_minimal.min.js
801 ms
web.assets_frontend_minimal.min.js
804 ms
css
38 ms
css
53 ms
My%20Website
301 ms
upstackers-home-banner.jpg
786 ms
about_bg.jpg
535 ms
about.jpg
646 ms
contact_us_bg.jpg
810 ms
choose.jpg
1169 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMOzY.woff
45 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMOzY.woff
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMOzY.woff
30 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMOzY.woff
44 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMOzY.woff
45 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMOzY.woff
46 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
1715 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-EsA.woff
78 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCxc-EsA.woff
77 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBxc-EsA.woff
76 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCBc-EsA.woff
76 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fABc-EsA.woff
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fCRc-EsA.woff
81 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-EsA.woff
79 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCxc-EsA.woff
77 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBxc-EsA.woff
78 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCBc-EsA.woff
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-EsA.woff
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fCRc-EsA.woff
81 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
84 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQFKw.woff
82 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxHIzQFKw.woff
83 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxLIzQFKw.woff
85 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxEIzQFKw.woff
85 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxMIzQFKw.woff
88 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxFIzQFKw.woff
85 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
86 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-EsA.woff
87 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCxc-EsA.woff
88 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBxc-EsA.woff
89 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCBc-EsA.woff
89 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-EsA.woff
91 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfCRc-EsA.woff
90 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
91 ms
NotoSansArabic-Reg.woff
659 ms
NotoSansHebrew-Reg.woff
938 ms
NotoSans-Reg.woff
977 ms
NotoSansArabic-Lig.woff
966 ms
NotoSansHebrew-Lig.woff
965 ms
NotoSans-Lig.woff
966 ms
NotoSansArabic-Hai.woff
1036 ms
NotoSansHebrew-Hai.woff
1216 ms
NotoSans-Hai.woff
977 ms
NotoSansArabic-Bol.woff
1239 ms
NotoSansHebrew-Bol.woff
1259 ms
NotoSans-Bol.woff
1257 ms
NotoSansArabic-Bla.woff
1258 ms
NotoSansHebrew-Bla.woff
1317 ms
NotoSans-Bla.woff
1496 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1626 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-EsA.woff
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCxc-EsA.woff
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBxc-EsA.woff
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCBc-EsA.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfABc-EsA.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfCRc-EsA.woff
55 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
74 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedGNE.woff
72 ms
font
83 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
72 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlE8-K.woff
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z11lE8-K.woff
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlE8-K.woff
84 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z11lE8-K.woff
72 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
70 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlE8-K.woff
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z11lE8-K.woff
71 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
70 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntGKPY.woff
76 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucXtGKPY.woff
76 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlE8-K.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z11lE8-K.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE8-K.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z11lE8-K.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
66 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlE8-K.woff
70 ms
font
128 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
66 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlE8-K.woff
68 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z11lE8-K.woff
124 ms
upstackers.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
upstackers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
upstackers.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upstackers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Upstackers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
upstackers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upstackers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: