6.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.3 sec
695 ms
Click here to check amazing Usability Testing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usabilitytesting.sg
Singapore based usability testing company that provides user experience and usability testing solutions in Singapore. Free Usability Testing Course.
Visit usabilitytesting.sgWe analyzed Usabilitytesting.sg page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
usabilitytesting.sg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value23,640 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.241
52/100
15%
Value34.7 s
0/100
10%
1090 ms
196 ms
287 ms
1125 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Usabilitytesting.sg, 15% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 188.0 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
881.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Usabilitytesting.sg main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 472.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Usability Testing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usabilitytesting.sg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (56%)
79
35
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usability Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usabilitytesting.sg
1090 ms
analytics.js
196 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
287 ms
1661908753index.css
1125 ms
css
67 ms
1661908753index.css
458 ms
css
67 ms
1622727530index.css
928 ms
1661908753index.js
927 ms
collect
39 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
addthis_widget.js
20 ms
1661908753index.css
408 ms
css
22 ms
wp-apis.com
297 ms
photon.js
442 ms
jquery.form.min.js
607 ms
scripts.js
632 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
76 ms
gprofiles.js
16 ms
wpgroho.js
677 ms
custom.js
1276 ms
jquery.sticky.js
938 ms
comment-reply.min.js
938 ms
commentplus_re.js
1277 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1276 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1277 ms
skrollr.min.js
1277 ms
waypoints.min.js
1349 ms
spin.js
1348 ms
jquery.spin.js
1367 ms
jetpack-carousel.js
1367 ms
e-202240.js
63 ms
BannerScientist.png
1304 ms
B.png
1458 ms
C.png
1227 ms
embed
600 ms
UsabilityLogoColor.png
350 ms
UsabilityLogoWhite-1.png
349 ms
Steve.png
919 ms
dropormal.png
386 ms
A.png
404 ms
A.png
349 ms
joel.png
1499 ms
linked.png
1277 ms
joel.png
1992 ms
D.png
1413 ms
C.png
1415 ms
D.png
1275 ms
aa.png
1146 ms
aa.png
1438 ms
B.png
1273 ms
web.png
1231 ms
Eugene.png
1412 ms
Eugene.png
1271 ms
sales-img.png
382 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
242 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
260 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
517 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
541 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfABc-AMP6lQ.woff
260 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kg.woff
260 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fABc-AMP6lQ.woff
259 ms
hovercard.min.css
102 ms
services.min.css
103 ms
admin-ajax.php
866 ms
js
125 ms
gen_204
31 ms
init_embed.js
32 ms
common.js
106 ms
util.js
126 ms
map.js
113 ms
overlay.js
56 ms
onion.js
39 ms
search_impl.js
41 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
150 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
69 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
32 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
53 ms
vt
185 ms
vt
241 ms
vt
202 ms
vt
203 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
64 ms
vt
123 ms
controls.js
3 ms
css
157 ms
css
158 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
92 ms
usabilitytesting.sg accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
usabilitytesting.sg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
usabilitytesting.sg SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usabilitytesting.sg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usabilitytesting.sg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usabilitytesting.sg
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Usability Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: