8.8 sec in total
717 ms
7.7 sec
432 ms
Click here to check amazing USIPL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usipl.com
USIPL is provide the best sugar plant technology for equipment manufacturing to integrated sugar plants & specially established for executing the Group’s EPC Projects across the globe.
Visit usipl.comWe analyzed Usipl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 717 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
usipl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.7 s
0/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.358
30/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
717 ms
702 ms
962 ms
45 ms
927 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Usipl.com, 14% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Usipl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (28%)
5.9 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Usipl.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 696.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, USIPL needs image optimization as it can save up to 696.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 422.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 422.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 468.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usipl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 468.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (26%)
87
64
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of USIPL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usipl.com
717 ms
www.usipl.com
702 ms
www.usipl.com
962 ms
gtm.js
45 ms
bootstrap.css
927 ms
style.css
1372 ms
responsive.css
696 ms
jquery.js
1162 ms
amazingslider.js
1657 ms
amazingslider-1.css
942 ms
initslider-1.js
946 ms
js
91 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1161 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1183 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
1182 ms
owl.js
1631 ms
wow.js
1398 ms
appear.js
1414 ms
script.js
1425 ms
css
31 ms
css
42 ms
font-awesome.css
235 ms
flaticon.css
264 ms
animate.css
737 ms
owl.css
294 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
467 ms
hover.css
729 ms
js
90 ms
usipl-logo-1.png
279 ms
image-1.jpg
489 ms
image-2.jpg
477 ms
image-3.jpg
916 ms
image-4.jpg
1204 ms
image-1-tn.jpg
278 ms
image-2-tn.jpg
480 ms
image-3-tn.jpg
491 ms
image-4-tn.jpg
727 ms
ab1.jpg
723 ms
ab2.jpg
729 ms
ab3.jpg
963 ms
ab4.jpg
965 ms
2.jpg
978 ms
project-thum1.jpg
967 ms
project-thum2.jpg
1149 ms
project-thum3.jpg
1215 ms
project-thum4.jpg
1200 ms
project-thum5.jpg
1216 ms
1094186565wk4.jpg
1221 ms
project-thum7.jpg
1381 ms
project-thum8.jpg
1436 ms
1822473108_DSC4108.JPG
1452 ms
21233918363.jpg
1684 ms
1026626031ra_sb_coupling.jpg
1457 ms
3217611491.jpg
1465 ms
1193258481panipat.jpg
1615 ms
891062079Dangote%20Sugar.png
1672 ms
bg.jpg
1697 ms
riopaila.jpg
1707 ms
ethiopia.jpg
1713 ms
Ambalika-Sugar.jpg
1850 ms
whitenile.jpg
1914 ms
1.png
1921 ms
2.png
1936 ms
3.png
1866 ms
4.png
1680 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
20 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
32 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
57 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
69 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
72 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
71 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
71 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
70 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
69 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
70 ms
fontawesome-webfont914c.woff
1811 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
101 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
99 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
99 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
100 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
100 ms
flaticon.svg
1926 ms
flaticon.woff
1682 ms
5.png
1693 ms
6.png
1692 ms
7.png
1473 ms
8.png
1598 ms
9.png
1685 ms
10.png
1517 ms
11.png
1469 ms
12.png
1472 ms
13.png
1595 ms
14.png
1664 ms
15.png
1494 ms
16.png
1452 ms
27.png
1459 ms
17.png
1461 ms
29.jpg
1579 ms
30.jpg
1655 ms
31.jpg
1499 ms
32.png
1471 ms
33.png
1690 ms
34.jpg
1458 ms
cl2.png
1564 ms
cl1.png
1497 ms
playvideo-64-64-0.png
1496 ms
carouselarrows-32-32-0.png
1468 ms
usipl.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
usipl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
usipl.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usipl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Usipl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usipl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of USIPL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: